Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 33
An opposing party, a party concerned, or a third party may file a motion with the court to revoke or amend its ruling which disallows or restricts the review, transcription, videotaping, or otherwise reproduction as in Paragraph 1 of the preceding article if the reason for such ruling ceases to exist.An interlocutory appeal may be filed against a ruling as in Paragraph 1 of the preceding article and the preceding paragraph. No motion by an opposing party, a party concerned, or a third party for the review, transcription, videotaping, or otherwise reproduction of litigation materials during an interlocutory appeal is allowed.The court shall disallow or restrict the review, transcription, videotaping, or otherwise reproduction of litigation materials during an interlocutory appeal against a ruling which dismisses the motion in Paragraph 1 of the preceding article and allows the motion in Paragraph 1.No trade secret known or held upon the review, transcription, videotaping, or otherwise reproduction in Paragraph 1 the preceding article may be used for purposes other than conducting the litigation.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第33條
前條第一項不予准許或限制裁定之原因消滅者，他造、當事人或第三人得聲請法院撤銷或變更該裁定。
前條第一項及前項之裁定，得為抗告。
於抗告中，他造、當事人或第三人聲請訴訟資料之閱覽、抄錄、攝影或其他方式之重製，不予准許。
駁回前條第一項聲請及准許第一項聲請之裁定，於抗告中，法院應不予准許或限制訴訟資料之閱覽、抄錄、攝影或其他方式之重製。
依前條第一項之閱覽、抄錄、攝影或其他方式之重製，而知悉或持有之營業秘密，不得為實施該訴訟以外之目的而使用。
前條第一項及前項之裁定，得為抗告。
於抗告中，他造、當事人或第三人聲請訴訟資料之閱覽、抄錄、攝影或其他方式之重製，不予准許。
駁回前條第一項聲請及准許第一項聲請之裁定，於抗告中，法院應不予准許或限制訴訟資料之閱覽、抄錄、攝影或其他方式之重製。
依前條第一項之閱覽、抄錄、攝影或其他方式之重製，而知悉或持有之營業秘密，不得為實施該訴訟以外之目的而使用。