Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 32

Where litigation materials involve trade secrets, the court may, without prejudicing the parties' benefit of argument, refuse or otherwise allow limited review, transcription, videotaping, or otherwise reproduction of such litigation materials upon motion of the parties or a third party.The motion in the preceding paragraph shall be in writing, with the scope specified by a code or by the name and number of the corresponding exhibit.As regards a copy or photocopy of the written motion in the preceding paragraph, the movant shall give direct notice to the opposing party, the party concerned, or a third party unless there exist circumstances which are emergent or sufficiently likely to cause the party concerned or the third party suffer material damage.The movant submitting the written motion shall make a preliminary showing if a dispute arises over whether the opposing party, the party concerned, or a third party has received a copy or photocopy of the written motion in the preceding paragraph.The court shall, before rendering a ruling as in Paragraph 1, accord the opposing party, the party concerned, or the third party an opportunity to be heard.The scopes and methods etc. of the non-public trial in the preceding article and the review, transcription, videotaping, or otherwise reproduction of litigation materials in the preceding paragraph, will be determined by the Judicial Yuan in conjunction with the Executive Yuan.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第32條
訴訟資料涉及營業秘密者,法院於不影響當事人行使辯論權之範圍內,得依當事人或第三人之聲請,裁定不予准許或限制訴訟資料之閱覽、抄錄、攝影或其他方式之重製。
前項聲請,應以書狀為之,並以代號或對應證據名稱編號之記載方式,特定其聲請範圍。
前項聲請書狀之繕本或影本,除有急迫或足致當事人或第三人受重大損害之虞者,聲請人應直接通知他造、當事人或第三人。
他造、當事人或第三人就曾否受領前項書狀繕本或影本有爭議時,由提出書狀之聲請人釋明之。
法院為第一項裁定前,應予他造、當事人或第三人陳述意見之機會。
法院辦理前條不公開審判,及第一項訴訟資料之閱覽、抄錄、攝影或其他方式之重製範圍及方法等事項,由司法院會同行政院定之。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.