Unmanned Vehicles Technology Innovative Experimentation Act Article 20

When implementing the innovative experimentation, if any one of the following circumstances arises, the competent authority may order the applicant to make improvement within a prescribed period of time:1.The experiments exceed the scope approved by the competent authority;2.The implementation does not conform to the scope of the approved decision as made by the competent authority;3.Events occur that are harmful to transportation services, or public transportation, or cause environmental hazards;4.There are genuine concerns that the experiments may endanger the safety of the person or property of the experiment participants or experiment stakeholders;5.Events occur that hinder national security, public order, or ethics;6.Circumstances violating the provisions of Article 14 through Article 19 of this Act occur.The competent authority may revoke the approval for the innovative experimentation if the applicant applies in writing to stop the innovative experimentation, or if the applicant is ordered to make improvements by the competent authority, pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, and the improvements is not taken within the prescribed period of time. However, if the circumstances of the preceding paragraph are significant or cannot be improved, the competent authority may directly revoke the approval for the innovative experimentation.The revocation of the innovative experimentation made by the competent authority pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, shall be posted on the government’s website including its effective date and reasons.
中文原文 無人載具科技創新實驗條例第20條
申請人辦理創新實驗,於實驗期間有下列情形之一者,主管機關得命其限期改善:
一、逾越主管機關核准之範圍。
二、未依主管機關核准決定辦理。
三、有不利於交通服務、公共運輸或造成環境災害之情事。
四、有危害參與實驗者或實驗利害關係人之人身或財產安全之虞。
五、妨害國家安全、公共秩序或善良風俗。
六、違反第十四條至第十九條規定。
申請人書面申請停止創新實驗,或經主管機關依前項規定命限期改善而屆期未改善者,主管機關得廢止創新實驗之核准。
但有前項情形情節重大或已無法改善者,主管機關得逕行廢止其創新實驗之核准。
主管機關依前項規定廢止創新實驗之核准,應將廢止核准日期及原因揭露於機關網站。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.