Mining Act Article 76
As to the mining land approved before October 20, 1995 without having conducted any environmental impact assessment and with an area larger than 2 hectares, the mineral right holder shall conduct according to the following provisions:1. If its annual average production amount over the past 5 years is not less than 50,000 tons or it is located in protection forests or tap water’s water quality/water volume protection areas, the mineral right holder shall apply mutatis mutandis Article 5 and related provisions of the Environmental Impact Assessment Act to conduct environmental impact assessment within 3 years from the implementation date of the provisions of this Act amended on May 26, 2023.2. If its annual average production amount over the past 5 years is less than 50,000 tons and it is not located in protection forests or tap water’s water quality/water volume protection areas, the mineral right holder shall apply mutatis mutandis Article 28 and related provisions of the Environmental Impact Assessment Act to conduct the survey and analysis of environmental impact and submit response strategies which it shall strictly implement after the approval of central competent authority of environmental protection within 5 years from the implementation date of the provisions of this Act amended on May 26, 2023.The mineral right holder who conducts environmental impact assessment under preceding Paragraph may continue to conduct the constructions of exploration or mining and shall conduct mine operation management, soil and water conservation treatment, environment maintenance and related safety measures in accordance with relevant laws and regulations during the period of submission and review of relevant information.If the mineral right holder fails to conduct within the period prescribed under Paragraph 1 and is penalized and ordered to conduct within a time limit specified by the competent authority under Subparagraph 7 of Article 81, and fails to do so within such specified time limit, the approval of such mining land shall be aborted.After the mineral right holder conducts the environmental impact assessment of original approved mining land under Subparagraph 1 of Paragraph 1 and the central competent authority of environmental protection reviews and decides that it shall continue to conduct a phase II environmental impact assessment, the mineral right holder shall prepare a draft environmental impact assessment report and submit it to the competent authority within 3 years from the day following the date of delivery of review conclusion. However, in special situation, such time limit may extend once before the expiration date and after the approval of competent authority. The extension period shall not be longer than 1 year. If failing to submit within the time limit, the constructions of exploration or mining shall be stopped from the expiration date.After the mineral right holder conducts the environmental impact assessment of original approved mining land under Subparagraph 1 of Paragraph 1 and the central competent authority of environmental protection notifies the competent authority that it decides that development shall not be allowed or its supplement and amendment does not comply relevant provisions, the mineral right holder shall stop the constructions of exploration or mining from the date of notification of competent authority and conduct pursuant to following provisions:1.In the situation that it is decided that the development shall not be allowed, the mineral right holder may submit alternative project for another review under Subparagraph 1 of Paragraph 1 within 1 year from the day following the date of delivery of review conclusion. If failing to submit within the time limit, or if the central competent authority of environmental protection notifies the competent authority that its supplement and amendment does not comply relevant provisions or it still decides that the development shall not be allowed after reviewing submitted alternative project, the approval of such mining land shall be aborted.2. In the situation that the supplement and amendment does not comply relevant provisions, the mineral right holder may submit for another review under Subparagraph 1 of Paragraph 1 within 1 year from the day following the date of notification of competent authority. If failing to conduct within the time limit, or if the central competent authority of environmental protection notifies the competent authority that its supplement and amendment still does not comply relevant provisions or it decides not to pass after review, the approval of such mining land shall be aborted.If the mineral right holder conducts the survey and analysis of environmental impact and submit response strategies under Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph 1 and the central competent authority of environmental protection notifies the competent authority that its supplement and amendment does not comply relevant provisions, the mineral right holder shall stop the constructions of exploration or mining since the date of notification of the competent authority and may resubmit the application under Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph 1 from the day following the date of notification of the competent authority.As the mineral right holder stops the constructions of exploration or mining under the preceding 3 paragraphs, only until the central competent authority of environmental protection reviews its environmental impact assessment and concludes that it is passed, or approves its survey, analysis and response strategies, the mineral right holder may apply to resume the constructions of exploration or mining.The mineral right holder shall conduct according to environmental impact assessment forms and documents and contents of review conclusion under Subparagraph 1 of Paragraph 1 or response strategies approved by the central competent authority of environmental protection under Subparagraph 2.
中文原文 礦業法第76條
中華民國八十四年十月二十日前已核定之礦業用地,未曾實施環境影響評估且面積大於二公頃者,其礦業權者應依下列規定辦理:
一、最近五年內年平均生產量在五萬公噸以上或位於保安林或自來水水質水量保護區者,應自本法中華民國一百十二年五月二十六日修正之條文施行之日起算三年內,準用環境影響評估法第五條及相關規定實施環境影響評估。
二、最近五年內年平均生產量未達五萬公噸且非位於保安林或自來水水質水量保護區者,應自本法一百十二年五月二十六日修正之條文施行之日起算五年內準用環境影響評估法第二十八條及相關規定辦理環境影響之調查、分析,並提出因應對策,送經中央環境保護主管機關核准後,切實執行。
依前項規定辦理環境影響評估者,於提送相關資料及審查期間,得繼續進行探採礦工程,並應依相關法規辦理礦場作業管理、水土保持處理與環境維護及相關安全措施。
礦業權者未依第一項期限辦理,經主管機關依第八十一條第七款規定處罰並限期辦理,屆期仍未辦理者,廢止該礦業用地之核定。
礦業權者依第一項第一款規定辦理原核定礦業用地之環境影響評估,經中央環境保護主管機關審查應繼續進行第二階段環境影響評估者,應於審查結論送達之次日起三年內,編製環境影響評估報告書初稿,向主管機關提出。
但情形特殊者,得於期限屆滿前,經主管機關核准後展延一次,展延期間不得超過一年。
屆期未提出者,應自期限屆滿之日起停止探採礦工程。
礦業權者依第一項第一款規定辦理原核定礦業用地之環境影響評估,經中央環境保護主管機關通知主管機關審查認定不應開發或其補正未符相關規定者,應自主管機關通知之日起停止探採礦工程,並依下列規定辦理:
一、認定不應開發者,得於審查結論送達之次日起一年內,提出替代方案依第一項第一款規定重新送審;屆期未提出、經中央環境保護主管機關通知主管機關其補正未符相關規定或提出之替代方案仍經審查認定不應開發者,廢止該礦業用地之核定。
二、補正未符相關規定者,得自主管機關通知之次日起一年內,依第一項第一款規定重新送審,屆期未辦理、經中央環境保護主管機關通知主管機關其補正仍未符相關規定或審查認定未通過者,廢止該礦業用地之核定。
礦業權者依第一項第二款規定辦理環境影響之調查、分析,並提出因應對策,經中央環境保護主管機關通知主管機關其補正未符相關規定者,應自主管機關通知之日起停止探採礦工程,並得自主管機關通知之次日起,依第一項第二款再次提出申請。
依前三項規定停止探採礦工程者,於環境影響評估經中央環境保護主管機關審查結論為通過,或調查、分析及因應對策經其核准後,礦業權者始得申請恢復探採礦工程。
礦業權者應依第一項第一款環境影響評估書件、審查結論內容或第二款中央環境保護主管機關核准之因應對策辦理。
一、最近五年內年平均生產量在五萬公噸以上或位於保安林或自來水水質水量保護區者,應自本法中華民國一百十二年五月二十六日修正之條文施行之日起算三年內,準用環境影響評估法第五條及相關規定實施環境影響評估。
二、最近五年內年平均生產量未達五萬公噸且非位於保安林或自來水水質水量保護區者,應自本法一百十二年五月二十六日修正之條文施行之日起算五年內準用環境影響評估法第二十八條及相關規定辦理環境影響之調查、分析,並提出因應對策,送經中央環境保護主管機關核准後,切實執行。
依前項規定辦理環境影響評估者,於提送相關資料及審查期間,得繼續進行探採礦工程,並應依相關法規辦理礦場作業管理、水土保持處理與環境維護及相關安全措施。
礦業權者未依第一項期限辦理,經主管機關依第八十一條第七款規定處罰並限期辦理,屆期仍未辦理者,廢止該礦業用地之核定。
礦業權者依第一項第一款規定辦理原核定礦業用地之環境影響評估,經中央環境保護主管機關審查應繼續進行第二階段環境影響評估者,應於審查結論送達之次日起三年內,編製環境影響評估報告書初稿,向主管機關提出。
但情形特殊者,得於期限屆滿前,經主管機關核准後展延一次,展延期間不得超過一年。
屆期未提出者,應自期限屆滿之日起停止探採礦工程。
礦業權者依第一項第一款規定辦理原核定礦業用地之環境影響評估,經中央環境保護主管機關通知主管機關審查認定不應開發或其補正未符相關規定者,應自主管機關通知之日起停止探採礦工程,並依下列規定辦理:
一、認定不應開發者,得於審查結論送達之次日起一年內,提出替代方案依第一項第一款規定重新送審;屆期未提出、經中央環境保護主管機關通知主管機關其補正未符相關規定或提出之替代方案仍經審查認定不應開發者,廢止該礦業用地之核定。
二、補正未符相關規定者,得自主管機關通知之次日起一年內,依第一項第一款規定重新送審,屆期未辦理、經中央環境保護主管機關通知主管機關其補正仍未符相關規定或審查認定未通過者,廢止該礦業用地之核定。
礦業權者依第一項第二款規定辦理環境影響之調查、分析,並提出因應對策,經中央環境保護主管機關通知主管機關其補正未符相關規定者,應自主管機關通知之日起停止探採礦工程,並得自主管機關通知之次日起,依第一項第二款再次提出申請。
依前三項規定停止探採礦工程者,於環境影響評估經中央環境保護主管機關審查結論為通過,或調查、分析及因應對策經其核准後,礦業權者始得申請恢復探採礦工程。
礦業權者應依第一項第一款環境影響評估書件、審查結論內容或第二款中央環境保護主管機關核准之因應對策辦理。