Civil Service Protection Act Article 66
This English translation was last updated on 2022-06-22, but the Chinese text was amended on 2025-07-09. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
While the CSPTC concludes a petition, filed according to Paragraph 1of Article 26, is sustainable, it shall specify a period and command the agency that should have taken an administrative action in the first place to take a certain administrative action immediately.The agency that should have taken an administrative action has taken an administrative action before the CSPTC has made the decision stipulated in the preceding paragraph, the CSPTC shall dismiss the petition as without merits by a decision.
中文原文 公務人員保障法第66條
對於依第二十六條第一項提起之復審，保訓會認為有理由者，應指定相當期間，命應作為之機關速為一定之處分。
保訓會未為前項決定前，應作為之機關已為行政處分者，保訓會應認為復審無理由，以決定駁回之。
保訓會未為前項決定前，應作為之機關已為行政處分者，保訓會應認為復審無理由，以決定駁回之。