Judges Act Article 58
Unless otherwise provided by law, reviews on cases of the first instance conducted by the Disciplinary Chamber of the Judiciary shall include oral arguments.The presiding judge of the first instance of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Judiciary, when necessary, may assign one judge as the commissioned judge to conduct the preparatory proceedings and clarify the cause of action. The investigation on evidence by the commissioned judge designated by the presiding judge shall be limited to the following: 1. Where it is necessary to investigate at the location of the evidence.2. Where it is required by the law to conduct the investigation at places outside the court.3. Where there is a likelihood that the investigation to be conducted on the day of oral argument will cause destruction or loss of evidence, obstruction of its use, or there are apparently other difficulties involved.4. Retrieve or order to present exhibits.5. Petition the competent authority to report on necessary matters.
中文原文 法官法第58條
職務法庭第一審案件之審理，除法律另有規定者外，應行言詞辯論。
職務法庭第一審審判長於必要時，得命法官一人為受命法官，先行準備程序，闡明起訴之事由。
受命法官經審判長指定調查證據，以下列情形為限：
一、有在證據所在地調查之必要者。
二、依法應在法院以外之場所調查者。
三、於言詞辯論期日調查，有致證據毀損、滅失或礙難使用之虞，或顯有其他困難者。
四、調取或命提出證物。
五、就必要之事項，請求該管機關報告。
職務法庭第一審審判長於必要時，得命法官一人為受命法官，先行準備程序，闡明起訴之事由。
受命法官經審判長指定調查證據，以下列情形為限：
一、有在證據所在地調查之必要者。
二、依法應在法院以外之場所調查者。
三、於言詞辯論期日調查，有致證據毀損、滅失或礙難使用之虞，或顯有其他困難者。
四、調取或命提出證物。
五、就必要之事項，請求該管機關報告。