Judges Act Article 33

The Judicial Evaluation Committee shall be composed of three judges, one prosecutor, three attorneys, as well as six scholars and social representatives; the members of the Evaluation Committee shall serve a two-year term and may be re-commissioned for another term.The members of the Evaluation Committee who have one of the following circumstances shall recuse themselves and shall not perform their duties:1. The member of the Evaluation Committee or his/her spouse, former spouse, or unmarried spouse is a party to the case involved in the evaluation event.2. The member of the Evaluation Committee is or was the blood relative within the eighth degree of kinship or the relative by marriage within the fifth degree of kinship of the judge being evaluated or of the petitioner.3. The member of the Evaluation Committee or his/her spouse, former spouse, or unmarried spouse has a relationship with the parties as a joint right holder, joint obligor, or debtor concerning the case involved in the evaluation event.4. In the case involved in the evaluation event, the member of the Evaluation Committee is currently or had once been the agent, defender, assistant ad litem or parent, or family member of the party concerned.5. The member of the Evaluation Committee had once been a witness or appraiser in the case involved in the evaluation event.6. The member of the Evaluation Committee had once participated in the self-disciplinary procedure for judges of the evaluation event. 7. The member of the Evaluation Committee is currently in office or had once been appointed for the last three years to handle various cases undertaken by the judge to be evaluated.In the following circumstances, the petitioner or the judge to be evaluated may petition for the recusal of the member of the Evaluation Committee:1. The member of the Evaluation Committee falls within any of the circumstances specified in the preceding paragraph but fails to recuse him/herself. 2. The member of the Evaluation Committee has circumstances other than those specified in the preceding paragraph, which is sufficient to believe that the performance of his/her duties may be biased.If the Judicial Evaluation Committee is in the opinion that the member of the Evaluation Committee has reasons to recuse him/herself, or upon the petition of the preceding paragraph, it shall adopt a decision on whether to grant the recusal, provided that the member of the Evaluation Committee who is the target for the recusal petition shall not participate in such a resolution.The resolution in the preceding paragraph shall not be appealed.
中文原文 法官法第33條
法官評鑑委員會由法官三人、檢察官一人、律師三人、學者及社會公正人士六人組成;評鑑委員任期為二年,得連任一次。
評鑑委員有下列各款情形之一者,應自行迴避,不得執行職務:
一、評鑑委員或其配偶、前配偶或未婚配偶,為評鑑事件所涉個案之當事人。
二、評鑑委員為受評鑑法官、請求人八親等內之血親或五親等內之姻親,或曾有此親屬關係。
三、評鑑委員或其配偶、前配偶或未婚配偶,就評鑑事件所涉個案,與當事人有共同權利人、共同義務人或償還義務人之關係。
四、評鑑委員於評鑑事件所涉個案,現為或曾為當事人之代理人、辯護人、輔佐人或家長、家屬。
五、評鑑委員於評鑑事件所涉個案,曾為證人或鑑定人。
六、評鑑委員曾參與評鑑事件之法官自律程序。
七、評鑑委員現受任或三年內曾受任辦理受評鑑法官所承辦之各類案件。
遇有下列各款情形,請求人或受評鑑法官得聲請評鑑委員迴避:
一、評鑑委員有前項所定之情形而不自行迴避者。
二、評鑑委員有前項所定以外之情形,足認其執行職務有偏頗之虞者。
法官評鑑委員會如認評鑑委員有應自行迴避之原因,或受前項之聲請,應為迴避與否之決議。
但被聲請迴避之評鑑委員,不得參與該決議。
前項決議,不得聲明不服。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.