Regulation For The Implementation Of The Self-discipline Of Judges At The Courts Of All Levels Article 12
This English translation was last updated on 2012-06-11, but the Chinese text was amended on 2020-10-19. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
The Self-Discipline Committee may render the following resolution(s) if it finds a judge to have any of the situations stipulated in the respective section of Article 6, Paragraph 1:(1) Recommending the individual having the supervising authority to issue an order under Article 21, Paragraph 1, Section 1 of the Act, urging the judge to take notice.(2) Recommending the individual having the supervising authority to issue a warning under Article 21, Paragraph 1, Section 2 of the Act.(3) Recommending the president of the court to request, in the name of the affiliated court, the Judicial Evaluation Committee to initiate an evaluation.(4) Recommending the Judicial Yuan to forward sua sponte such disciplinable matter directly to the Control Yuan for review in accordance with Article 51, Paragraph 2 of the Act.(5) Recommending an order to make improvement within a specific time limit or other appropriate dispositions.In the event that the Self-Discipline Committee considers a judge having any reason to be awarded, it shall resolve to recommend the Judicial Yuan to provide awards.No appeal shall be made to the resolutions specified in the preceding two paragraphs.
中文原文 各級法院法官自律實施辦法第12條
自律會經審議認為法官有第六條第一項各款所列情形者，得為下列決議：
一、建議職務監督權人依本法第二十一條第一項第一款發命令促其注意。
二、建議職務監督權人依本法第二十一條第一項第二款加以警告。
三、建議院長以所屬法院名義請求法官評鑑委員會評鑑。
四、建議司法院依本法第五十一條第二項規定逕行移送監察院審查。
五、建議限期改善或其他適當之處置。
自律會經審議認為法官有依法應受獎勵之事由者，應作成建議司法院獎勵之決議。
前二項之決議，不得聲明不服。
一、建議職務監督權人依本法第二十一條第一項第一款發命令促其注意。
二、建議職務監督權人依本法第二十一條第一項第二款加以警告。
三、建議院長以所屬法院名義請求法官評鑑委員會評鑑。
四、建議司法院依本法第五十一條第二項規定逕行移送監察院審查。
五、建議限期改善或其他適當之處置。
自律會經審議認為法官有依法應受獎勵之事由者，應作成建議司法院獎勵之決議。
前二項之決議，不得聲明不服。