Family Act Article 46
This English translation was last updated on 2012-01-11, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-06-21. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
Except as otherwise provided in the statutory law, where a party has either abandoned or admitted the claim during an oral argument proceeding with regard to a matter that is subject to that party’s own disposition in accordance with Paragraph 1 of Article 45, the court shall, based upon such abandonment or admission, enter a judgment against such a party. Nonetheless, the foregoing provision shall not apply with regard to matters involving divorce or termination of an adoptive relation, where any of the following circumstances exists:1. the abandonment or admission in question has not been stated in person by the party involved before the court;2. the claim is joined with other claims, and a joint or consistent decision cannot be made on the matters as a whole;3. the abandonment or admission in question is likely to prejudice the interest of a minor child, and a joint decision that incorporates protective measures for the interest of the minor child in question cannot be made.With regard to the circumstances provided in the preceding paragraph, the presiding judge shall, prior to making a decision based upon the abandonment or admission by the parties, clarify the extent to which the interests of parties are likely to be affected by the court’s decision.Where a party has abandoned the claim during an oral argument proceeding in person before the court with regard to a matter that is not subject to that party’s own disposition, the said party shall be deemed to have voluntarily dismissed the action. Nonetheless, the foregoing provision shall not apply with regard to circumstances where the multiple actions jointly initiated by the party are premised upon the abandonment of the claim in question.Articles 262 to 264 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the circumstances provided in Paragraph 4 of Article 46.
中文原文 家事事件法第46條
當事人於言詞辯論期日就前條第一項得處分之事項,為捨棄或認諾者,除法律別有規定外,法院應本於其捨棄或認諾為該當事人敗訴之判決。
但離婚或終止收養關係事件有下列各款情形之一者,不在此限:
一、其捨棄或認諾未經當事人本人到場陳明。
二、當事人合併為其他請求,而未能為合併或無矛盾之裁判。
三、其捨棄或認諾有危害未成年子女之利益之虞,而未能就其利益保護事項為合併裁判。
前項情形,本於當事人之捨棄或認諾為判決前,審判長應就該判決及於當事人之利害為闡明。
當事人本人於言詞辯論期日就不得處分之事項為捨棄者,視為撤回其請求。
但當事人合併為其他請求,而以捨棄之請求是否成立為前提者,不在此限。
民事訴訟法第二百六十二條至第二百六十四條之規定,於前項情形準用之。
但離婚或終止收養關係事件有下列各款情形之一者,不在此限:
一、其捨棄或認諾未經當事人本人到場陳明。
二、當事人合併為其他請求,而未能為合併或無矛盾之裁判。
三、其捨棄或認諾有危害未成年子女之利益之虞,而未能就其利益保護事項為合併裁判。
前項情形,本於當事人之捨棄或認諾為判決前,審判長應就該判決及於當事人之利害為闡明。
當事人本人於言詞辯論期日就不得處分之事項為捨棄者,視為撤回其請求。
但當事人合併為其他請求,而以捨棄之請求是否成立為前提者,不在此限。
民事訴訟法第二百六十二條至第二百六十四條之規定,於前項情形準用之。