Family Act Article 33

This English translation was last updated on 2012-01-11, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-06-21. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.

With regard to matters that are not subject to the parties’ disposition, where the parties are very close to agreeing on their settlement or where the parties do not dispute the existence or inexistence of the transaction or occurrence that has given rise to the case, the parties may, by agreement, petition for a court ruling.Prior to making a ruling in accordance with the preceding paragraph, the court shall take into consideration the opinions of the mediators and the reports submitted by the family matter investigation officer. The court shall also investigate facts and necessary evidence on its own initiative, and it shall grant the parties or known interested parties an opportunity to speak on the results of the investigation. The Parties’ motion for an oral argument proceeding shall be granted.Provisions in Part I, Chapter II, Section 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure on third person intervention shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the proceedings provided in Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article.
中文原文 家事事件法第33條
當事人就不得處分之事項,其解決事件之意思已甚接近或對於原因事實之有無不爭執者,得合意聲請法院為裁定。
法院為前項裁定前,應參酌調解委員之意見及家事調查官之報告,依職權調查事實及必要之證據,並就調查結果使當事人或知悉之利害關係人有陳述意見之機會。
當事人聲請辯論者,應予准許。
前二項程序,準用民事訴訟法第一編第二章第三節關於訴訟參加之規定。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.