Juvenile Justice Act Article 61
A juvenile, his/her statutory agent, a person who currently protects the juvenile or his/her assistant may file an interlocutory appeal if he/she disagrees with a ruling made by the juvenile court in the following categories; where an interlocutory appeal is to be filed by the assistant, the decision of whether to file the appeal may not contradict the express intent of the party who appointed the assistant:1. a ruling that sends a juvenile to a juvenile investigation officer for consulting in accordance with Article 26, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 1;2. a ruling that orders a juvenile to be sent to a juvenile detention center or a ruling that denies the application of release to the custody of another party in accordance with Article 26, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 2;3. a ruling that orders a juvenile to observe the specified stipulations in accordance with Article 26, Paragraphs 2 and 3;4. a ruling that extends the period of detention or denies the application to revoke the ruling ordering the detention in accordance with Article 26-2, Paragraph 1;5. a ruling made in accordance with Article 27, Paragraph 1 or Paragraph 2;6. a ruling made in accordance with Article 29, Paragraphs 1;7. a ruling made in accordance with Article 40;8. a disposition made in accordance with Article 42;9. a ruling that orders detention for observation made in accordance with Article 55, Paragraph 3 or Article 55-3, and a ruling that revokes the probation so as to send the juvenile to a corrective education in accordance with Article 55, Paragraph 4;10. a ruling that extends the duration of placement counseling made in accordance with Article 55-2, Paragraph 3, or a disposition that revokes the placement counseling so as to send the juvenile to a corrective education in accordance with Article 55-2, Paragraph 5;11. a ruling that revokes the application for waiving or suspending the execution of corrective education in accordance with Article 56, Paragraph 1;12. a disposition that orders the continuation of the execution of corrective education in accordance with Article 56, Paragraph 4;13. a ruling that orders the bearing of education cost in accordance with Article 60.
中文原文 少年事件處理法第61條
少年、少年之法定代理人、現在保護少年之人或輔佐人，對於少年法院所為下列之裁定有不服者，得提起抗告。
但輔佐人提起抗告，不得與選任人明示之意思相反：
一、第二十六條第一項第一款交付少年調查官為適當輔導之裁定。
二、第二十六條第一項第二款命收容或駁回聲請責付之裁定。
三、依第二十六條第二項、第三項所為命少年應遵守事項之裁定。
四、第二十六條之二第一項延長收容或駁回聲請撤銷收容之裁定。
五、第二十七條第一項、第二項之裁定。
六、第二十九條第一項之裁定。
七、第四十條之裁定。
八、第四十二條之處分。
九、第五十五條第三項、第五十五條之三留置觀察之裁定及第五十五條第四項之撤銷保護管束執行感化教育之處分。
十、第五十五條之二第三項延長安置輔導期間之裁定、第五項撤銷安置輔導執行感化教育之處分。
十一、駁回第五十六條第一項聲請免除或停止感化教育執行之裁定。
十二、第五十六條第四項命繼續執行感化教育之處分。
十三、第六十條命負擔教養費用之裁定。
但輔佐人提起抗告，不得與選任人明示之意思相反：
一、第二十六條第一項第一款交付少年調查官為適當輔導之裁定。
二、第二十六條第一項第二款命收容或駁回聲請責付之裁定。
三、依第二十六條第二項、第三項所為命少年應遵守事項之裁定。
四、第二十六條之二第一項延長收容或駁回聲請撤銷收容之裁定。
五、第二十七條第一項、第二項之裁定。
六、第二十九條第一項之裁定。
七、第四十條之裁定。
八、第四十二條之處分。
九、第五十五條第三項、第五十五條之三留置觀察之裁定及第五十五條第四項之撤銷保護管束執行感化教育之處分。
十、第五十五條之二第三項延長安置輔導期間之裁定、第五項撤銷安置輔導執行感化教育之處分。
十一、駁回第五十六條第一項聲請免除或停止感化教育執行之裁定。
十二、第五十六條第四項命繼續執行感化教育之處分。
十三、第六十條命負擔教養費用之裁定。