Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 35
In infringement cases involving patent rights, copyrights in computer programs or trade secrets, if a party has made a preliminary showing that any rights or interests that it claims have been or are likely to be infringed, and the opposing party denies such claim, the court shall order the opposing party to raise a specific defense as to the fact and evidence concerning its denial within a prescribed time limit.The court may, subject to the circumstances, find the preliminary showing of the infringed party true if the opposing party mentioned in the preceding paragraph fails without good cause to raise a defense within the prescribed time limit or to raise a specific defense.The court shall accord the parties an opportunity to present their arguments before adopting the circumstances mentioned in the preceding paragraph as basis for judgment.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第35條
專利權、電腦程式著作權、營業秘密侵害之事件,如當事人就其主張之權利或利益受侵害,或有受侵害之虞之事實已釋明者,他造否認其主張時,法院應定期命他造就其否認之事實及證據為具體答辯。
前項他造無正當理由,逾期未答辯或答辯非具體者,法院得審酌情形認當事人已釋明之內容為真實。
前項情形,法院應予當事人辯論之機會,始得採為裁判之基礎。
前項他造無正當理由,逾期未答辯或答辯非具體者,法院得審酌情形認當事人已釋明之內容為真實。
前項情形,法院應予當事人辯論之機會,始得採為裁判之基礎。