Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 36

Where any of the following situations occurs with respect to trade secrets held by a party or a third party, the court may, upon motion along with a preliminary showing by such party or third party, issue a confidentiality preservation order upon the opposing party, the first-mentioned party, an agent, an assistant ad litem, or other related party to the action:1. A party's own trade secrets or those of a third party are disclosed in the first-mentioned party's pleadings, or evidence-taking that has been or is to be made involves trade secrets of the party or a third party.2. Limitation on discovery or use is required so as to prevent the discovery or use of the trade secrets in the preceding paragraph being intended for purposes other than those related to the case, and there are concerns of obstruction to the party's or the third party's business operation as a result of the disclosure of the trade secrets.The preceding paragraph does not apply where an opposing party, a party concerned, an agent, an assistant ad litem, or other related party has obtained or possessed such trade secrets through means other than the document review or evidence-taking prior to the motion.If a party concerned or a third party still fails to file a motion for a confidentiality preservation order in accordance with Paragraph 1 as directed by the court when the court deems it necessary to issue such order, the court may, at the request of the opposing party or the first-mentioned party, and after hearing the opinion of the first-mentioned party or the third party, so issue against those not subject to the confidentiality preservation order in Paragraph 1.The person subject to a confidentiality preservation order shall not use the trade secrets for purposes other than those related to the case, nor shall it disclose said trade secrets to those not subject to the order.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第36條
當事人或第三人就其持有之營業秘密,經釋明符合下列情形者,法院得依該當事人或第三人之聲請,對他造、當事人、代理人、輔佐人或其他訴訟關係人發秘密保持命令:
一、當事人書狀之內容,記載當事人或第三人之營業秘密,或已調查或應調查之證據,涉及當事人或第三人之營業秘密。
二、為避免因前款之營業秘密經開示,或供該訴訟進行以外之目的使用,有妨害該當事人或第三人基於該營業秘密之事業活動之虞,致有限制其開示或使用之必要。
前項規定,於他造、當事人、代理人、輔佐人或其他訴訟關係人,在聲請前已依書狀閱覽或證據調查以外方法,取得或持有該營業秘密時,不適用之。
法院認有核發秘密保持命令之必要時,經曉諭當事人或第三人依第一項規定提出聲請,仍不聲請者,法院得依他造或當事人之請求,並聽取當事人或第三人之意見後,對未受第一項秘密保持命令之人發秘密保持命令。
受秘密保持命令之人,就該營業秘密,不得為實施該訴訟以外之目的而使用,或對未受秘密保持命令之人開示。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.