Administrative Litigation Act Article 125-1

After seeking opinions from the parties to the litigation, the presiding judge may set a deadline and order the parties to the litigation to do the following:1. make statements about facts or point out the methods of proof.2. submit the documents or objects that the parties to the litigation have legal obligations to submit.If the parties to the litigation miss the deadline described in the preceding Paragraph to make statements about facts, point out the methods of proof, or submit the documents or objects, and if all the following conditions are met, the administrative court may, unless otherwise stipulated by law, make judgments or rulings regardless of such statements about facts or methods of proof:1. missing the deadline hinders the conclusion of the litigation.2. the parties to the litigation fail to demonstrate that missing the deadline was not attributable to them.3. the presiding judge notified the parties to the litigation beforehand of the consequences of missing the deadline.
中文原文 行政訴訟法第125-1條
審判長得於徵詢當事人之意見後,定期間命其為下列事項:
一、陳述事實或指出證據方法。
二、提出其依法負提出義務之文書或物件。
當事人逾前項期間,遲延陳述事實、指出或提出證據方法,符合下列情形者,除法律別有規定外,行政法院得不予斟酌,逕依調查結果裁判之:
一、其遲延有礙訴訟之終結。
二、當事人未能釋明其遲延係不可歸責於己。
三、審判長已告知其遲延之效果。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.