Administrative Litigation Act Article 125

An administrative court shall, on its initiative, investigate the factual relationships, and shall not be bound by the parties' factual claims and assertions about the evidence.The parties to the litigation shall cooperate with the investigation referred to in the preceding Paragraph.The presiding judge shall strive to allow the parties to examine and debate the facts and the law adequately and comprehensively.The presiding judge shall question or inform the parties, direct them to make factual representations, offer evidences, or make other necessary statements and representations. If the statements, representations, or types of litigation are ambiguous or incomplete, the presiding judge shall direct the presenting party to clarify or complete them.After informing the presiding judge, the associate judge may question or inform the parties.
中文原文 行政訴訟法第125條
行政法院應依職權調查事實關係,不受當事人事實主張及證據聲明之拘束。
前項調查,當事人應協力為之。
審判長應注意使當事人得為事實上及法律上適當完全之辯論。
審判長應向當事人發問或告知,令其陳述事實、聲明證據,或為其他必要之聲明及陳述;其所聲明、陳述或訴訟類型有不明瞭或不完足者,應令其敘明或補充之。
陪席法官告明審判長後,得向當事人發問或告知。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.