Citizen Judges Act (Act on Criminal Trials with the participation of Citizen Judge (Guomin Faguan)) Article 54
The defense attorney shall, after the disclosure is made by the prosecutor pursuant to the preceding article, submit a written pleading for the preliminary proceedings, with its duplicate copies served to the prosecutor, which shall contain the following matters in concrete detail:1. A statement on whether the accused pleads guilty to the facts cited in the indictment; and where the accused pleads not guilty, his or her statements on the defense of the accused, as well as the statement on whether he or she contests the facts stated in the indictment;2. Opinions on the admissibility of the evidence that the prosecutor petitions to investigate and on whether there is a need for the investigation;3. The evidence the accused petitions to investigate and its relevance with the facts to be proven;4. The name, gender, domicile or residence of the witness, expert witness, or interpreter to be summoned and the estimated time for their respective examination; and5. Opinions on the provisions applied in the indictment by the prosecutor.To supplement or correct the matters of the preceding paragraph, the defense attorney shall submit another written pleading for the preliminary proceedings or make an oral statement at court in the proceedings.Paragraphs 3 to 5 of Article 52 apply mutatis mutandis to the circumstances of the preceding two paragraphs.The accused may submit a written pleading or a statement on matters of the various subparagraphs of Paragraph 1 of this article. Paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 52 apply mutatis mutandis to this circumstance.
中文原文 國民法官法第54條
辯護人於檢察官依前條之規定開示證據後,應以準備程序書狀分別具體記載下列各款之事項,提出於法院,並將繕本送達於檢察官:
一、被告對檢察官起訴事實認罪與否之陳述;如否認犯罪,其答辯,及對起訴事實爭執或不爭執之陳述。
二、對檢察官聲請調查證據之證據能力及有無調查必要之意見。
三、聲請調查之證據及其與待證事實之關係。
四、聲請傳喚之證人、鑑定人、通譯之姓名、性別、住居所及預期詰問所需之時間。
五、對檢察官所引應適用法條之意見。
前項各款事項有補充或更正者,應另以準備程序書狀或當庭以言詞提出於法院。
第五十二條第三項至第五項規定,於前二項之情形準用之。
被告亦得提出關於第一項各款事項之書狀或陳述。
於此情形,準用第五十二條第三項、第四項之規定。
一、被告對檢察官起訴事實認罪與否之陳述;如否認犯罪,其答辯,及對起訴事實爭執或不爭執之陳述。
二、對檢察官聲請調查證據之證據能力及有無調查必要之意見。
三、聲請調查之證據及其與待證事實之關係。
四、聲請傳喚之證人、鑑定人、通譯之姓名、性別、住居所及預期詰問所需之時間。
五、對檢察官所引應適用法條之意見。
前項各款事項有補充或更正者,應另以準備程序書狀或當庭以言詞提出於法院。
第五十二條第三項至第五項規定,於前二項之情形準用之。
被告亦得提出關於第一項各款事項之書狀或陳述。
於此情形,準用第五十二條第三項、第四項之規定。