The Labor Incident Adjudication Rules Article 9
This English translation was last updated on 2019-11-15, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-08-23. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
If any one of the following circumstances applies to the assistant, as mentioned in Article 9, Paragraph 1 of this Act, the presiding judge or the commissioned judge may, during the proceeding, rule to prohibit the said person from serving as an assistant:1. The labor union, incorporated foundation, or assistant acts in solicitation of lawsuits or champerty.2. The labor union, incorporated foundation, or assistant demands remuneration, consideration, transfer of rights, or other benefits from workers.3. The assistant does not follow the instructions of the presiding judge or the commissioned judge, or acts in a manner that hinders the proceedings.4. The assistant is not suitable for litigation or has committed other acts against the interests of the workers.The preceding ruling prohibiting a person from acting as an assistant, is not appealable.
中文原文 勞動事件審理細則第9條
本法第九條第一項之輔佐人，有下列情形之一者，審判長或受命法官得於程序進行中以裁定禁止其為輔佐人：
一、工會、財團法人或輔佐人，有挑唆或包攬訴訟之行為。
二、工會、財團法人或輔佐人，有向勞工請求報酬、對價、移轉權利或其他利益之行為。
三、輔佐人不遵從審判長或受命法官之訴訟指揮，或有其他妨礙程序進行之行為。
四、輔佐人不適為訴訟行為或有其他違反勞工利益之行為。
前項禁止擔任輔佐人之裁定，不得抗告。
一、工會、財團法人或輔佐人，有挑唆或包攬訴訟之行為。
二、工會、財團法人或輔佐人，有向勞工請求報酬、對價、移轉權利或其他利益之行為。
三、輔佐人不遵從審判長或受命法官之訴訟指揮，或有其他妨礙程序進行之行為。
四、輔佐人不適為訴訟行為或有其他違反勞工利益之行為。
前項禁止擔任輔佐人之裁定，不得抗告。