The Labor Incident Adjudication Rules Article 77

When workers file a motion with the court for a provisional seizure, provisional disposition, or a temporary status quo injunction, as described in the stipulation of Article 46 of this Act, their request for a provisional remedy is limited to that of a civil dispute case, where workers may petition the competent authority for a ruling in accordance with the Act for Settlement of Labor-Management Disputes.The decision that replaces the preliminary showing, as stipulated in Article 46, Paragraph 2 of this Act, is limited to the portion of the decision made concerning the petition for a provisional remedy.If a statement of decision is submitted before the court makes a ruling on the motion filed by workers, as described in Article 46, Paragraph 1 of this Act, the provisions of Article 46, Paragraph 2 of this Act shall apply; the same shall apply if said submission is made after an interlocutory appeal is filed.
中文原文 勞動事件審理細則第77條
本法第四十六條所定之勞工向法院聲請假扣押、假處分或定暫時狀態處分,其保全之請求,以勞工依勞資爭議處理法規定向主管機關申請裁決之民事爭議事件之請求為限。
本法第四十六條第二項所定代替釋明之裁決,以聲請保全之請求經裁決決定之部分為限。
勞工所為本法第四十六條第一項之聲請,於法院作成裁定前,提出裁決決定書者,適用本法第四十六條第二項規定;其提起抗告後始提出者,亦同。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.