Domestic Violence Prevention Act Article 13

In case of any omission of procedure or requirement in a petition for a protection order, the court shall enter a ruling to reject the petition. However, if the omission may be corrected, an order should be issued to demand the correction before a set deadline.The court may investigate evidence and may conduct segregated interrogations if required.If required, the segregated interrogations under the previous paragraph may be conducted outside the court pursuant to petition or on its own initiative. Any technical equipment allowing two-way transmission of voice and image and other proper segregation measures may also be used.During a court trial, the victim may file a petition seeking the presence of any family member or social worker or psychologist, who may also state their opinions.The trial regarding a protection order shall not be public.Before the court completes the trial, it may listen to the opinions of the municipal or county (city) competent authority or social welfare institutions.No mediation or settlement is allowed in a case of a protection order.After the court accepts a petition for a protection order, the trial should be conducted swiftly. The issuance of a protection order shall not be delayed based on the reason of other cases between the parties that are under investigation or other pending litigation.
中文原文 家庭暴力防治法第13條
聲請保護令之程式或要件有欠缺者,法院應以裁定駁回之。
但其情形可以補正者,應定期間先命補正。
法院得依職權調查證據,必要時得隔別訊問。
前項隔別訊問,必要時得依聲請或依職權在法庭外為之,或採有聲音及影像相互傳送之科技設備或其他適當隔離措施。
被害人得於審理時,聲請其親屬或個案輔導之社工人員、心理師陪同被害人在場,並得陳述意見。
保護令事件之審理不公開。
法院於審理終結前,得聽取直轄市、縣(市)主管機關或社會福利機構之意見。
保護令事件不得進行調解或和解。
法院受理保護令之聲請後,應即行審理程序,不得以當事人間有其他案件偵查或訴訟繫屬為由,延緩核發保護令。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.