Regulations Governing Accreditation of Teacher Qualifications at Junior Colleges and Institutions of Higher Education Article 22
This English translation was last updated on 2022-08-17, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-08-30. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
The representative work referred to in Subparagraph 3 of Paragraph 1 of the previous article shall meet the following requirements:1. The nature of the representative work shall be related to the subject（s）taught by the applicant.2. The representative work shall be not part of any degree thesis or dissertation. If, however, their degree treatise has not previously been submitted for an accreditation review, or if the representative work is part of research that is a continuation of their degree treatise, and the applicant has provided explanatory details on their own initiative and a professional assessment has determined that the submitted work contains a considerable degree of innovation and/or new ideas, the representative work is not subject to this requirement.If a work does not satisfy the provisions of the subparagraphs of the previous paragraph, the accreditation application will not be qualified.
中文原文 專科以上學校教師資格審定辦法第22條
前條第一項第三款所定代表作，應符合下列規定：
一、與送審人任教科目性質相關。
二、非為學位論文之一部分。
但未曾以該學位論文送審或屬學位論文延續性研究者，經送審人主動提出說明，並經專業審查認定代表作具相當程度創新者，不在此限。
未符前項各款規定之一者，其教師資格審定不合格。
一、與送審人任教科目性質相關。
二、非為學位論文之一部分。
但未曾以該學位論文送審或屬學位論文延續性研究者，經送審人主動提出說明，並經專業審查認定代表作具相當程度創新者，不在此限。
未符前項各款規定之一者，其教師資格審定不合格。