Regulations Governing the Organization of the Selection Committee and the Evaluation for Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects Article 24
The task force shall explain to the Selection Committee the evaluation results of different Committee members.As per the preceding explanation, where the Selection Committee confirms the evaluation results of different Committee members revealing distinct discrepancies, the chairman should refer the discrepancies to the Committee for one of the following resolutions, and the proceedings shall be included in the meeting minutes::1. Exclude the evaluation results of individual Committee members and recalculate the evaluation results;2. Conduct a re-evaluation;3. Decide not to select the best or the second best applicant.If the re-evaluation as per Subparagraph 2 of the preceding Paragraph still carries distinct discrepancies, the Selection Committee may make the resolution pursuant to the subparagraph 1 or 3 in the same paragraph.
中文原文 民間參與公共建設甄審委員會組織及評審辦法第24條
工作小組應向甄審會說明不同委員之評審結果。
甄審會就前項說明確認不同委員之評審結果有明顯差異者，主席應提交甄審會依下列方式之一作成決議，並列入會議紀錄：
一、除去個別委員評審結果，重計評審結果。
二、辦理複評。
三、無法評定最優或次優申請人。
依前項第二款複評結果仍有明顯差異，僅得依同項第一款或第三款辦理。
甄審會就前項說明確認不同委員之評審結果有明顯差異者，主席應提交甄審會依下列方式之一作成決議，並列入會議紀錄：
一、除去個別委員評審結果，重計評審結果。
二、辦理複評。
三、無法評定最優或次優申請人。
依前項第二款複評結果仍有明顯差異，僅得依同項第一款或第三款辦理。