Immigration Act Article 38-3

The time spent on one of the following circumstances shall be excluded in the twenty-four hour restriction indicated in Paragraph 2 of the preceding Article, unless there is no unnecessary delay:1. The time spent on the delay caused by traffic obstruction or force majeure;2. The time spent during the transfer of an detainee;3. The interview cannot be conducted due to a detainee’s sudden health prbolems;4. The person filing the objection according to Paragraph 1 of the preceding Article disagree to make written recordsin the evening;5. The records can’t be prepared without the presence of an authorized representative to represent the detainee. The time spent on waiting for an authorized representative shall not exceed four hours. The same rule applies to waiting for persons named in Paragraph 1 of the preceding Article in case a detainee with intellectual and development of disability fails to provide a clear and complete statement;6. The records cannot be prepared without the presence of an interpreter that the detainee may require. The waiting time for an interpreter shall not exceed six hours;7. The time spent while judicial authorities review a criminal case;Based on the proceeding Paragraphs, the National Immigration Agency shall specify the reason in the written report to the court.Where the National Immigration Agency fails to bring a detainee to court within twenty-four hours, the detention order shall be terminate and the detainee be released.
中文原文 入出國及移民法第38-3條
前條第二項所定二十四小時,有下列情形之一者,其經過期間不予計入。
但不得有不必要之遲延:
一、因交通障礙或其他不可抗力事由所生不得已之遲滯。
二、在途移送時間。
三、因受收容人身體健康突發之事由,事實上不能詢問。
四、依前條第一項提出異議之人不同意於夜間製作收容異議紀錄。
五、受收容人表示已委任代理人,因等候其代理人到場致未予製作收容異議紀錄。
但等候時間不得逾四小時。
其因智能障礙無法為完全之陳述,因等候經通知陪同在場之人到場,致未予製作前條第一項之收容異議紀錄,亦同。
六、受收容人須由通譯傳譯,因等候其通譯到場致未予製作前條第一項之收容異議紀錄。
但等候時間不得逾六小時。
七、因刑事案件經司法機關提訊之期間。
前項情形,移民署應於移送法院之意見書中釋明。
移民署未依第一項規定於二十四小時內移送者,應即廢止暫予收容處分,並釋放受收容人。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.