Innovation Act for Industry-Academia Collaboration and Talent Cultivation in National Key Fields Article 38

A teacher on the staff of a key research institute who considers that some measure taken by the key research institute that the teacher has personally been subject to is illegal or inappropriate and that it constitutes a violation of their rights and interests may lodge an appeal, and a further appeal with the faculty grievance review committee at each level, in accordance with the provisions of Article 42 of the Teachers’ Act.If there is no representative of the key research institute among the members of a national university faculty grievance review committee referred to in the preceding paragraph that will deliberate over a case, an additional person shall be appointed to the committee and the normal restrictions on the number of committee members and their term on the committee do not apply.For other key research institute personnel for whom education legislation may be applied, mutatis mutandis, or for whom such matters are handled with reference to the provisions of the Teachers’ Act regarding appeals, the provisions of the two preceding paragraphs may be applied, mutatis mutandis.
中文原文 國家重點領域產學合作及人才培育創新條例第38條
研究學院編制內教師就研究學院有關其個人之措施,認為違法或不當,致損害其權益者,得依教師法第四十二條規定,向各級教師申訴評議委員會提起申訴、再申訴。
國立大學教師申訴評議委員會於審議前項案件時,委員組成無研究學院代表者,應增聘一人擔任委員,不受原有委員總額及任期之限制。
研究學院其他人員依教育法規得準用或比照教師法之申訴規定者,得準用前二項規定。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.