The Servicemember Relief Act Article 69
Except for the case that the original administrative disposition or management measure is apparently a minor intervention, whereas the re-appellant who disagrees with the conclusion of the re-appeal may, within 1 month from the next day of the date on which the conclusion of the re-appeal is served, initiate administrative litigation in the Service Tribunal with the juridical boundaries where the original disposition agency or the original management measure agency seats. In the event that the re-appeal conclusion is served during the navigation deployment, the 1 month period begins to run from the next day of the date on which the deployment berths at the domestic port.In the event that the original disposition agency or the original management measure agency fails to follow the provision of Article 68 that Article 49 applies mutatis mutandis and thus fails to render an administrative disposition or management measure, the re-appellant may, within 1 month from the next day after the expiration of the designated period, directly initiate administrative litigation in the Service Tribunal with the juridical boundaries where the original disposition agency or the original management measure agency seats.In the event that the original disposition agency or the original management measure agency applies Article 49 mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provision of Article 68 and renders administrative disposition or management measure thereby yet the re-appellant nonetheless disagrees with the disposition or measure, he/she may directly initiate administrative litigation in the Service Tribunal with the juridical boundaries where the original disposition agency or the original management measure agency seats. The provision in Paragraph 1 applies mutatis mutandis vis-a-vis the period limit for initiation of an administrative litigation.In the event that the re-appellant disagrees with the consolidation decision vis-avis re-appeal pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Article 9, the re-appellant may initiate consolidation administrative litigation in the Service Tribunal with the juridical boundaries where the Protection Committee rendering the consolidation adjudication decision seats.The Service Tribunal may apply Small Claims Proceeding stipulated in the Administrative Litigation Act mutatis mutandis for adjudication of the litigation in the 4 preceding Paragraphs.
中文原文 軍人權益事件處理法第69條
再申訴人不服再申訴決定者,除原行政處分或原管理措施屬顯然輕微之干預外,得於再申訴決定送達之次日起一個月內,向原處分機關或原措施機關所在地之勤務法庭提起行政訴訟。
但再申訴決定於艦艇航行期間送達者,其一個月期間自艦艇返抵國內港口之次日起算。
原處分機關或原措施機關未依第六十八條準用第四十九條規定,於權保會指定期間內作成行政處分或管理措施者,再申訴人得於指定期間屆滿日之次日起一個月內,逕向原處分機關或原措施機關所在地之勤務法庭提起行政訴訟。
原處分機關或原措施機關依第六十八條準用第四十九條規定再作成之行政處分或管理措施,再申訴人仍有不服者,得逕向原處分機關或原措施機關所在地之勤務法庭提起行政訴訟;其提起行政訴訟期間,準用第一項規定。
不服依第九條第三項合併審議之再申訴決定者,再申訴人得向該合併審議之權保會所在地之勤務法庭合併提起行政訴訟。
前四項訴訟,由勤務法庭準用行政訴訟法簡易訴訟程序審理。
但再申訴決定於艦艇航行期間送達者,其一個月期間自艦艇返抵國內港口之次日起算。
原處分機關或原措施機關未依第六十八條準用第四十九條規定,於權保會指定期間內作成行政處分或管理措施者,再申訴人得於指定期間屆滿日之次日起一個月內,逕向原處分機關或原措施機關所在地之勤務法庭提起行政訴訟。
原處分機關或原措施機關依第六十八條準用第四十九條規定再作成之行政處分或管理措施,再申訴人仍有不服者,得逕向原處分機關或原措施機關所在地之勤務法庭提起行政訴訟;其提起行政訴訟期間,準用第一項規定。
不服依第九條第三項合併審議之再申訴決定者,再申訴人得向該合併審議之權保會所在地之勤務法庭合併提起行政訴訟。
前四項訴訟,由勤務法庭準用行政訴訟法簡易訴訟程序審理。