The Servicemember Relief Act Article 43
The Protection Committee may, ex officio or at the request of agencies (institutes), require related schools, juridical persons, organizations, or individuals with professional experience and knowledge to conduct the examination, inspection, or give expert testimony vis-a-vis essential items and evidence. The expert witness shall be assigned by the Protection Committee.When the Protection Committee conducts the inspection proscribed in the preceding paragraph, the petitioner and other persons involved shall be notified of the date, time, and place to appear.The expenses incurred due to the provisions in Paragraph 1 shall be borne by the Protection Committee and may be paid in advance by portion upon the request of the expert witness.The conclusion of the examination, inspection, or expert testimony pursuant to Paragraph 1 shall not be regarded by the Protection Committee as the unfavorable premises for deliberation decision against the petitioner unless the petitioner has been given an opportunity to express its opinion.While the petitioner is willing to bear the expense incurred by its request for the examination, inspection, or expert testimony, pursuant to Paragraph 1, but the Protection Committee considered otherwise, the request shall not be denied without justifiable reason.While the conclusion of the examination, inspection, or expert testimony in the preceding paragraph is the premises for a favorable decision or adjudication for the petitioner, it may request the Protection Committee for reimbursement of necessary expenses within 30 days after the petition decision is final and binding.
中文原文 軍人權益事件處理法第43條
權保會得依職權或囑託有關機關(構)、學校、法人、團體或具專門知識經驗者,就必要之物件、證據,實施檢驗、勘驗或鑑定。
鑑定人由權保會指定之。
權保會依前項規定實施勘驗時,應將日、時、處所通知復審人及有關人員到場。
第一項所需費用,由權保會負擔;權保會得依鑑定人之請求預行酌給之。
權保會依第一項檢驗、勘驗或鑑定之結果,非經賦予復審人表示意見之機會,不得採為對其不利之復審決定之基礎。
權保會認無實施檢驗、勘驗或鑑定之必要,而復審人願自行負擔費用,請求依第一項規定實施檢驗、勘驗或鑑定時,權保會非有正當理由不得拒絕。
依前項規定檢驗、勘驗或鑑定所得結果,據為有利於復審人之決定或裁判時,復審人得於復審或行政訴訟確定後三十日內,請求權保會償還必要之費用。
鑑定人由權保會指定之。
權保會依前項規定實施勘驗時,應將日、時、處所通知復審人及有關人員到場。
第一項所需費用,由權保會負擔;權保會得依鑑定人之請求預行酌給之。
權保會依第一項檢驗、勘驗或鑑定之結果,非經賦予復審人表示意見之機會,不得採為對其不利之復審決定之基礎。
權保會認無實施檢驗、勘驗或鑑定之必要,而復審人願自行負擔費用,請求依第一項規定實施檢驗、勘驗或鑑定時,權保會非有正當理由不得拒絕。
依前項規定檢驗、勘驗或鑑定所得結果,據為有利於復審人之決定或裁判時,復審人得於復審或行政訴訟確定後三十日內,請求權保會償還必要之費用。