Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act Article 50
When a prosecutor files a public prosecution and considers it necessary, he/she may set out his/her opinions on the scope of punishment against the defendant in the indictment and explain the reasons.After commiting a fraud crime and before paying compensation for all damages suffered by the victim or paying the entire settlement amount reached with the victim at a mediation or a settlement, the court shall base its decision on the punishment by paying special attention to whether or not the perpetrator has met any of the following circumstances:1. Having purchased, leased, or used goods or services, which exceeds the average living standards of ordinary people.2. Having used the means of transportation, which exceeds the average living standards of oredinary people.3. Having made investments, which exceeds the average living standards of ordinary people.4. Having patronized high-end venues, which exceeds the average living standards of ordinary people.5. Having gifted or lent property, which exceeds the average living standards of ordinary people.6. Having had monthly living expenses, which exceeds the average living standards of ordinary people.
中文原文 詐欺犯罪危害防制條例第50條
檢察官提起公訴認有必要時，得於起訴書記載對被告科刑範圍之意見，並敘明理由。
犯詐欺犯罪後，犯罪行為人於賠償被害人所受全部損害或支付與被害人達成調解或和解之全部金額前，法院尤應注意犯罪行為人有無下列事項，為科刑輕重之標準：
一、購買、租賃或使用逾越一般人通常生活程度之商品或服務。
二、搭乘逾越一般人通常生活程度之交通工具。
三、為逾越一般人通常生活程度之投資。
四、進入逾越一般人通常生活程度之高消費場所消費。
五、贈與或借貸他人逾越一般人通常生活程度之財物。
六、每月生活費用逾越一般人通常生活之程度。
犯詐欺犯罪後，犯罪行為人於賠償被害人所受全部損害或支付與被害人達成調解或和解之全部金額前，法院尤應注意犯罪行為人有無下列事項，為科刑輕重之標準：
一、購買、租賃或使用逾越一般人通常生活程度之商品或服務。
二、搭乘逾越一般人通常生活程度之交通工具。
三、為逾越一般人通常生活程度之投資。
四、進入逾越一般人通常生活程度之高消費場所消費。
五、贈與或借貸他人逾越一般人通常生活程度之財物。
六、每月生活費用逾越一般人通常生活之程度。