Enforcement Rules of the Control Act Article 35

If original investigators or two or more members of the Control Yuan deem that review is necessary in cases where an application for case review exceeds the deadline stipulated in Paragraph 2, Article 31 or does not correspond to circumstances stipulated in Article 33, they may submit, once per case, a written explanation of the reason to the president of the Control Yuan for approval. If approved, the case shall be submitted to a review committee to render a decision on the review.The review committee referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be formed by seven members of the Control Yuan chosen sequentially by lots, excluding members who initiated the case. The first member thus appointed shall serve as the chairperson of the committee. Reviews may only be conducted when at least two-thirds of the committee members are present at the committee meeting. Decisions shall be made by agreement of a majority of the attending members through a secret ballot vote.When the review referred to in the preceding paragraph results in a determination to conduct a re-examination, members shall be assigned to investigate as stipulated in Paragraph 2, Article 34 and a re- examination report shall be prepared according to provisions in Paragraph 1, Article 34.
中文原文 監察法施行細則第35條
申請覆查案件,已逾第三十一條第二項所定期限或未符合第三十三條規定情事,經原調查人員或其他監察委員二人以上認為有覆查必要者,得以書面敘明理由陳報院長核交審查會審查決定之。
惟同一案件以一次為限。
前項審查會由提案委員外監察委員七人為審查委員,依籤定席次輪流擔任,以輪序最前者為主席,開會時應有審查委員三分之二以上之出席始得審查。
由出席審查委員用無記名投票表決,以投票委員過半數同意決定之。
經前項審查,決定覆查之案件,依第三十四條第二項規定輪派委員調查,其覆查報告依第三十四條第一項規定辦理。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.