Civil Service Protection Act Article 72

This English translation was last updated on 2022-06-22, but the Chinese text was amended on 2025-07-09. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.

While an objection may be expressed in accordance with laws against the deliberation decision of the CSPTC, the deliberation decision shall have an annexed statement of notification that, if there is an objection against the deliberation decision, the right to file for remedy with the judicial agency with jurisdiction shall be exercised in accordance with laws within 2 months fromthe next day after the decision is served.While the annexed statement in the preceding paragraph is erroneous, a correction notice shall be served, and the statutory period shall be recalculate from the next day after the correction notice is served.While the CSPTC fails to enclose in the statement a notification with respect to the remedy period or a notified period is erroneous and not corrected so that the petitioner fails to file for remedy within the period, the remedy shall be deemed as filed within the period stipulated in Paragraph 1 in case such a filing iswithin 1 year from the date after the deliberation decision is served.
中文原文 公務人員保障法第72條
保訓會復審決定依法得聲明不服者,復審決定書應附記如不服決定,得於決定書送達之次日起二個月內,依法向該管司法機關請求救濟。
前項附記錯誤時,應通知更正,並自更正通知送達之次日起,計算法定期間。
如未附記救濟期間,或附記錯誤未通知更正,致復審人遲誤者,如於復審決定書送達之次日起一年內請求救濟,視為於第一項之期間內所為。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.