Judges Act Article 41-1
The Judicial Evaluation Committee may conduct necessary investigations upon the petition of the judge under evaluation and the petitioner or ex officio, and notify related parties to appear for explanations; the information acquired from the investigation, unless otherwise provided by laws or regulations, shall not be provided to other agencies, organizations, or individuals, or shall not be made available for browsing or transcribing.Petitions made by judges under evaluation and petitioners to appear at the meeting for making statements of opinions shall not be denied unless they are obviously unnecessary; the making of statements may be restricted at the meeting if it involves improper words and conduct.The petitioner may file a petition for the delivery of the opinion submitted by the judge under evaluation. The Judicial Evaluation Committee shall not restrict or deny such a petition without a legitimate reason; if it consents to the delivery, a reasonable period of time shall also be given to the judge under evaluation to express his/her opinions.The judge under evaluation and the petitioner may file a petition for reading, transcribing, photocopying or video recording the materials acquired from the investigation in Paragraph 1. However, the Judicial Evaluation Committee may restrict or deny the petition under one of the following circumstances:1. Drafts composed before the resolution on the individual case evaluation is to be adopted.2. Preparatory documents or documents to be reviewed for adopting resolutions on the individual case evaluation.3. It is necessary to protect the legitimate rights and interests of third parties.4. It is otherwise required to keep it confidential pursuant to the law or based on the public interest.The information acquired from the petition pursuant to the preceding paragraph shall be kept confidential.The evaluation procedures with regard to the investigation of facts and evidence, dates and periods, and service of process shall apply mutatis mutandis to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act unless otherwise provided in this Act.
中文原文 法官法第41-1條
法官評鑑委員會得依受評鑑法官及請求人之聲請或依職權為必要之調查，並得通知關係人到會說明；調查所得資料，除法令另有規定外，不得提供其他機關、團體、個人，或供人閱覽、抄錄。
受評鑑法官及請求人聲請到會陳述意見，除顯無必要者外，不得拒絕；其到會陳述如有不當言行，並得制止之。
請求人得聲請交付受評鑑法官提出之意見書，如無正當理由，法官評鑑委員會不得限制或拒絕之；如同意交付，並應給予表示意見之合理期間。
受評鑑法官及請求人得聲請閱覽、抄錄、複印或攝錄第一項調查所得資料。
但有下列情形之一者，法官評鑑委員會得限制或拒絕之：
一、個案評鑑事件決議前擬辦之文稿。
二、個案評鑑事件決議之準備或審議文件。
三、為第三人之正當權益有保障之必要。
四、其他依法律或基於公益，有保密之必要。
前項經聲請而取得之資料，應予保密。
評鑑程序關於調查事實及證據、期日與期間及送達，除本法另有規定外，準用行政程序法之規定。
受評鑑法官及請求人聲請到會陳述意見，除顯無必要者外，不得拒絕；其到會陳述如有不當言行，並得制止之。
請求人得聲請交付受評鑑法官提出之意見書，如無正當理由，法官評鑑委員會不得限制或拒絕之；如同意交付，並應給予表示意見之合理期間。
受評鑑法官及請求人得聲請閱覽、抄錄、複印或攝錄第一項調查所得資料。
但有下列情形之一者，法官評鑑委員會得限制或拒絕之：
一、個案評鑑事件決議前擬辦之文稿。
二、個案評鑑事件決議之準備或審議文件。
三、為第三人之正當權益有保障之必要。
四、其他依法律或基於公益，有保密之必要。
前項經聲請而取得之資料，應予保密。
評鑑程序關於調查事實及證據、期日與期間及送達，除本法另有規定外，準用行政程序法之規定。