Family Act Article 96
This English translation was last updated on 2012-01-11, but the Chinese text was amended on 2023-06-21. Later amendments may not be reflected in the translation — please refer to the Chinese text.
Provisions with regard to rehearing proceeding in PART V of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to a final and binding ruling on the substantive claims made on a family non-litigation matter. Notwithstanding the foregoing provision, where there exists one of the following circumstances, no motion for rehearing may be made on the identical ground:1. the ground for review, having been asserted in an interlocutory appeal, in a motion for rehearing, or in a motion for revoking or amending, has been overruled on ground of being meritless;2. the ground for review, having been known but not been covered by an interlocutory appeal, or having been covered by an interlocutory appeal but not been asserted, has been overruled on ground of being meritless.
中文原文 家事事件法第96條
民事訴訟法第五編再審程序之規定，於家事非訟事件之確定本案裁定準用之。
但有下列各款情形之一者，不得更以同一事由聲請再審：
一、已依抗告、聲請再審、聲請撤銷或變更裁定主張其事由，經以無理由被駁回。
二、知其事由而不為抗告；或抗告而不為主張，經以無理由被駁回。
民事訴訟法第四百九十六條第一項第四款、第七款及第二項規定，於參審員參與審理之家事事件準用之。
但有下列各款情形之一者，不得更以同一事由聲請再審：
一、已依抗告、聲請再審、聲請撤銷或變更裁定主張其事由，經以無理由被駁回。
二、知其事由而不為抗告；或抗告而不為主張，經以無理由被駁回。
民事訴訟法第四百九十六條第一項第四款、第七款及第二項規定，於參審員參與審理之家事事件準用之。