Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Rules Article 60

Where, in the reasons of a conclusive judgment on an intellectual property civil litigation, an issue of cancellation or revocation of an intellectual property right or amendment of patent claims as under Paragraph 1, Article 41 or Paragraphs 1 and 2, Article 43 of the Act is determined on the basis of the results of arguments presented, if the same party raises in other actions regarding the same issue a claim or defense contrary to the gist of the final judgment on the basis of the same basic facts, the court shall make its determination by deliberating on the relevant circumstances such as whether the above final judgment is obviously in contrary to laws and regulations or unfair, whether new litigation information emerges that may affect the outcome of the judgment, and the principle of good faith.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理細則第60條
智慧財產民事訴訟之確定判決理由中,就本法第四十一條第一項或第四十三條第一項、第二項關於智慧財產權有應予撤銷或廢止原因或更正專利權範圍之爭點,本於辯論結果而為判斷者,關於同一爭點之其他訴訟事件,同一當事人就同一基礎事實,為反於確定判決意旨之主張或抗辯時,法院應審酌原確定判決是否顯然違背法令、顯失公平、出現足以影響判斷結果之新訴訟資料及誠信原則等情形認定之。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.