Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Rules Article 47
If a party or third party refuses to move for a confidentiality preservation order without just cause after being directed by the court under Paragraph 3, Article 36 of the Act to do so, the opposing party or the party may request the court to issue a confidentiality preservation order against persons not subject to the confidentiality preservation order in Paragraph 1, Article 36 of the Act.To consider whether there are grounds for the refusal to file a motion as in the preceding paragraph, the court may, before making a finding, order the party or third party to make a preliminary showing of the specific content and extent of the disadvantages caused by a disclosure of the trade secrets, whether there are alternative methods of disclosure, or whether it is necessary to file the motion etc.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理細則第47條
當事人或第三人經法院依本法第三十六第三項規定曉諭聲請發秘密保持命令,無正當理由拒絕聲請者,他造或當事人得請求法院對未受本法第三十六條第一項秘密保持命令之人發秘密保持命令。
法院為判斷前項拒絕聲請有無正當理由,得命當事人或第三人釋明營業秘密因開示所生不利益之具體內容及程度、有無代替開示之方法或有無聲請之必要等情形而為認定。
法院為判斷前項拒絕聲請有無正當理由,得命當事人或第三人釋明營業秘密因開示所生不利益之具體內容及程度、有無代替開示之方法或有無聲請之必要等情形而為認定。