Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Rules Article 44
A party or third party filing a motion for a confidentiality preservation order in accordance with Paragraph 1, Article 36 of the Act shall submit a pleading stating the following facts regarding elements and make a preliminary showing of the matters described in Subparagraphs (1) and (2) below:(1) The party's pleadings or evidence-taking that has been or is to be made involves trade secrets. (2) It is necessary to impose restrictions on the disclosure or use of the trade secret since disclosure or use of the trade secret for a purpose other than the purpose of the legal proceeding in question is likely to hinder the business activity which the party or third party engages in based on such trade secret.(3) As of the motion for the confidentiality preservation order, the person to be subject to the order has not obtained or possessed the trade secret by ways other than the perusal of the pleadings or investigation of the evidence.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理細則第44條
當事人或第三人依本法第三十六條第一項規定聲請發秘密保持命令者，應以書狀記載下列要件事實，並釋明下列第一款及第二款事項：
一、當事人書狀記載之內容、已調查或應調查之證據涉及營業秘密。
二、營業秘密如經開示，或供該訴訟進行以外之目的使用，有妨害當事人或第三人基於該營業秘密之事業活動之虞，而有限制其開示或使用之必要。
三、於秘密保持命令聲請前，應受秘密保持命令之人並未自閱覽書狀或調查證據以外方法，取得或持有該營業秘密。
一、當事人書狀記載之內容、已調查或應調查之證據涉及營業秘密。
二、營業秘密如經開示，或供該訴訟進行以外之目的使用，有妨害當事人或第三人基於該營業秘密之事業活動之虞，而有限制其開示或使用之必要。
三、於秘密保持命令聲請前，應受秘密保持命令之人並未自閱覽書狀或調查證據以外方法，取得或持有該營業秘密。