Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 59
The transferee court in the proviso in Paragraph 2 of the preceding article shall stay the proceedings by a ruling and request the Supreme Court to designate the court with jurisdiction if the first-mentioned court finds jurisdiction disputed, unless an interlocutory appeal has been filed by a party in accordance with Paragraph 3 of the preceding article and found meritless by the Supreme Court.The Supreme Court shall overrule by a ruling the request in the preceding paragraph if it finds the transferee court has jurisdiction, and shall designate the court with jurisdiction over the case if it finds the transferee court has no jurisdiction.The designated court in the preceding paragraph shall be bound by the ruling by which it is designated.The Supreme Court may not reverse a judgment on the principal case of a transferee court or designated court on a case on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction when such judgment is appealed.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第59條
前條第二項但書之情形,受移送之法院認管轄權有爭議者,除當事人已依前條第三項規定提起抗告,經最高法院認為無理由者外,應以裁定停止訴訟程序,並向最高法院請求指定管轄法院。
前項情形,最高法院認受移送法院有管轄權,應以裁定駁回之;認受移送法院無管轄權,應以裁定指定該案件之管轄法院。
前項情形,受指定之法院,應受指定裁定之羈束。
受移送法院或受指定之法院所為本案裁判之上訴,最高法院不得以無管轄權為由撤銷之。
前項情形,最高法院認受移送法院有管轄權,應以裁定駁回之;認受移送法院無管轄權,應以裁定指定該案件之管轄法院。
前項情形,受指定之法院,應受指定裁定之羈束。
受移送法院或受指定之法院所為本案裁判之上訴,最高法院不得以無管轄權為由撤銷之。