Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 58

An appeal or interlocutory appeal against a judgment of the first instance rendered by a district court in an ordinary proceeding, summary trial proceeding, or bargaining process on a case as in Paragraph 1 of Article 54 or a case entertained by an intellectual property tribunal of first instance shall be filed with an intellectual property tribunal of second instance. The same applies to an interlocutory appeal requesting review of a ruling on compulsory measures which the district court renders during investigation in a case as in Paragraph 1 or Subparagraph 1 of Paragraph 2 of Article 54.The preceding paragraph applies to the other criminal cases associated with the cases in Paragraph 2 of Article 54 and prescribed by Paragraph 1 of Article 7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , and that have been tried jointly in the district court and subjected to appeal or interlocutory appeal jointly. Notwithstanding, an intellectual property tribunal of second instance may by a ruling consolidate the cases and transfer them to the competent High Court provided that the other criminal cases are more serious and are complicated.An interlocutory appeal may be filed against the ruling in the preceding proviso.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第58條
不服地方法院關於第五十四條第一項案件或第一審智慧財產法庭受理之案件,依通常、簡式審判或協商程序所為第一審裁判,提起上訴或抗告者,應向第二審智慧財產法庭為之;不服地方法院關於第五十四條第一項及第二項第一款案件於偵查中所為強制處分裁定,提起抗告者,亦同。
與第五十四條第一項案件有刑事訴訟法第七條第一款所定相牽連關係之其他刑事案件,經地方法院合併裁判,並合併上訴或抗告者,適用前項規定。
但其他刑事案件係較重之罪,且案情確係繁雜者,第二審智慧財產法庭得裁定合併移送該管高等法院審判。
前項但書之裁定,得為抗告。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.