Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 56
Where a dossier or exhibit of a trade secret criminal case or a supplemental civil action thereof involves a trade secret of a party or an interested party which is a method for proving or making a preliminary showing of a fact of an offense or of damages, the party or interested party may file a motion with the court for determining a de-identified pseudonym or code before the first trial date, save in special circumstances.The motion in the preceding paragraph shall specify the following expressly in writing:1. the trade secret that shall be de-identified2. the wording for the pseudonym or code3. that disclosure of the trade secret in Subparagraph 1 during the proceedings is likely to impair any business activity which a party or an interested party conducts based on such secretThe court shall accord the persons concerned an opportunity to be heard before rendering a ruling as in Paragraph 1.The court shall overrule by a ruling a motion as in Paragraph 1 if it finds the motion fails to comply with legal formality or shall not be granted as a matter of law or is meritless, provided that where such failure to comply with legal formality is amendable, the court shall order an amendment to be made within a prescribed time limit.The court shall allow before the first trial date a motion as in Paragraph 1 if it finds the motion meritorious, save in special circumstances.No interlocutory appeal may be filed against a ruling as in the preceding two paragraphs.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第56條
營業秘密刑事案件及其附帶民事訴訟,其卷宗及證物之內容涉及當事人或利害關係人之營業秘密,而為犯罪事實或損害賠償事實之證明或釋明方法者,除有特別情形外,當事人或利害關係人於第一次審判期日前,得聲請法院定其去識別化之代稱或代號。
前項聲請,應以書狀明確記載下列事項:
一、應去識別化之營業秘密。
二、代稱或代號之用語。
三、第一款之營業秘密於訴訟程序開示,有妨害當事人或利害關係人基於該營業秘密之事業活動之虞。
法院為第一項裁定前,應予訴訟關係人陳述意見之機會。
法院對於第一項之聲請,認為不合法律上之程式或法律上不應准許或無理由者,應以裁定駁回之。
但其不合法律上之程式可以補正者,應定期間先命補正。
法院認為第一項之聲請有理由者,除有特別情形外,應於第一次審判期日前裁定准許之。
前二項裁定,不得抗告。
前項聲請,應以書狀明確記載下列事項:
一、應去識別化之營業秘密。
二、代稱或代號之用語。
三、第一款之營業秘密於訴訟程序開示,有妨害當事人或利害關係人基於該營業秘密之事業活動之虞。
法院為第一項裁定前,應予訴訟關係人陳述意見之機會。
法院對於第一項之聲請,認為不合法律上之程式或法律上不應准許或無理由者,應以裁定駁回之。
但其不合法律上之程式可以補正者,應定期間先命補正。
法院認為第一項之聲請有理由者,除有特別情形外,應於第一次審判期日前裁定准許之。
前二項裁定,不得抗告。