Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 52
An applicant seeking an injunction maintaining the temporary status quo shall provide a preliminary showing proving it is necessary to prevent material harm or imminent danger or other similar circumstances with regard to the legal relation in dispute. The court shall dismiss the application if the preliminary showing is insufficient.When the grounds for an application for an injunction maintaining the temporary status quo are demonstrated in the preliminary showing, the court may still order the applicant to provide a bond for granting the injunction.Before an injunction maintaining the temporary status quo is granted, the court shall accord the parties an opportunity to be heard. However, where the applicant asserts and is able to provide evidence to substantiate its assertion that there is a special circumstance that shall restrict the respondent from being notified before the injunction is issued, and the court deems such assertion appropriate, or finds the applicant's application manifestly without legal ground, the above shall not apply.The court may, upon motion or ex officio, revoke an injunction maintaining the temporary status quo where the movant fails to prove to the court within a peremptory period of 14 days of the service of the ruling granting the injunction that an action has been initiated.The revocation described in the preceding paragraph shall become effective when public notice of the revocation is given.When the court revokes an injunction maintaining the temporary status quo because such order is not justified ab initio, due to the situation prescribed in Paragraph 4, or upon motion of the movant, or by virtue of a conclusive judgment against the movant on the case, the applicant of the injunction shall indemnify the respondent against damage suffered.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第52條
聲請定暫時狀態之處分時,聲請人就有爭執之法律關係,及防止發生重大之損害,或避免急迫之危險,或有其他相類之情形,而有必要之事實,應釋明之;其釋明有不足者,法院應駁回聲請。
聲請之原因雖經釋明,法院仍得命聲請人供擔保後為定暫時狀態之處分。
法院為定暫時狀態之處分前,應予當事人陳述意見之機會。
但聲請人主張有不能於處分前通知相對人陳述之特殊情事,並提出確實之證據,經法院認為適當,或法院認聲請人之聲請顯無理由者,不在此限。
聲請人自定暫時狀態之處分送達之日起十四日之不變期間內,未向法院為起訴之證明者,法院得依聲請或依職權撤銷之。
前項撤銷處分之裁定於公告時生效。
定暫時狀態處分之裁定,因自始不當、第四項情形、聲請人聲請或其受本案判決敗訴確定而撤銷者,聲請人應賠償相對人因處分所受之損害。
聲請之原因雖經釋明,法院仍得命聲請人供擔保後為定暫時狀態之處分。
法院為定暫時狀態之處分前,應予當事人陳述意見之機會。
但聲請人主張有不能於處分前通知相對人陳述之特殊情事,並提出確實之證據,經法院認為適當,或法院認聲請人之聲請顯無理由者,不在此限。
聲請人自定暫時狀態之處分送達之日起十四日之不變期間內,未向法院為起訴之證明者,法院得依聲請或依職權撤銷之。
前項撤銷處分之裁定於公告時生效。
定暫時狀態處分之裁定,因自始不當、第四項情形、聲請人聲請或其受本案判決敗訴確定而撤銷者,聲請人應賠償相對人因處分所受之損害。