Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 49

Where any of the following measures becomes conclusive, no party may initiate an action for retrial in accordance with Subparagraph 11 of Paragraph 1 of Article 496 of the Code of Civil Procedure in regard to a final and conclusive judgment on a patent, trademark, or plant variety right infringement case:1. a measure finding the invalidation of a patent right, invalidation or revocation of a trademark right, or nullification or cancellation of a plant variety right founded2. a measure finding an invalidation action over the extension of the term of an invention patent founded3. a measure approving an amendment of the description, claim(s), or drawing(s) of a patentUnder the circumstance in the preceding paragraph, no respondent to a matter concerning provisional attachment, provisional injunction, or an injunction maintaining a temporary status quo may claim compensation from a movant for damage sustained from the provisional attachment, provisional injunction, or injunction maintaining a temporary status quo.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第49條
下列各款之處分確定時,當事人不得依民事訴訟法第四百九十六條第一項第十一款規定,對於專利權、商標權、品種權侵害事件之確定終局判決提起再審之訴:
一、專利權舉發、商標權評定或廢止、品種權撤銷或廢止成立之處分。
二、延長發明專利權期間舉發成立之審定。
三、核准更正專利說明書、申請專利範圍或圖式之審定。
前項情形,假扣押、假處分或定暫時狀態處分事件之相對人,不得向聲請人請求賠償因假扣押、假處分或定暫時狀態處分所受之損害。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.