Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 44
The court may, where necessary, seek the advice of the competent intellectual property authority on relevant legislation or other necessary matters for the purpose of determining the merits of a claim or defense which a party raises in accordance with Paragraph 1 of Article 41.In regard to an advice sought under the preceding paragraph or where it deems necessary for opinions to be stated, the competent intellectual property authority may, where the court deems appropriate, present its opinion to the court in writing or through its designee.The court shall accord the parties an opportunity to present their arguments on an opinion which the competent intellectual property authority states in accordance with the preceding paragraph, before adopting such opinion as basis for judgment.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第44條
法院為判斷當事人依第四十一條第一項所為之主張或抗辯有無理由,或前條第四項更正專利權範圍之合法性,於必要時,得就相關法令或其他必要事項,徵詢智慧財產專責機關之意見。
智慧財產專責機關就前項事項之徵詢,或認有陳述意見之必要,並經法院認為適當者,得以書面或指定專人向法院陳述意見。
智慧財產專責機關依前項規定陳述之意見,法院應予當事人辯論之機會,始得採為裁判之基礎。
智慧財產專責機關就前項事項之徵詢,或認有陳述意見之必要,並經法院認為適當者,得以書面或指定專人向法院陳述意見。
智慧財產專責機關依前項規定陳述之意見,法院應予當事人辯論之機會,始得採為裁判之基礎。