Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act Article 22

A verifier shall sign a written oath before verification, indicating that its verification will be impartial and truthful and that it agrees to be subjected to punishment for perjury if its verification is false etc.In conducting a verification, a verifier may access the place of the object to be verified to verify documents or devices or equipment according to the method permitted by the court and, in addition, may ask questions to a verified party or request said party to present a necessary document.A Technical Examination Officer may, if necessary, also perform the acts of verification in the preceding paragraph in order to assist a verifier with verification.Where a party under verification refuses or hinders a verification without good cause, the court may, taking all circumstances into consideration, deem the factum probandum which the applicant seeks to be verified to be true.The court shall accord the parties an opportunity to present their arguments before adopting the circumstance in the preceding paragraph as basis for judgment.The court may by a ruling fine a third party under verification not more than NT$100,000 for refusing or hindering a verification without good cause.An interlocutory appeal may be filed against the ruling in the preceding paragraph. Enforcement shall be suspended during the interlocutory appeal.
中文原文 智慧財產案件審理法第22條
假扣押、假處分或定暫時狀態處分之聲請,在起訴前,向應繫屬之法院為之,在起訴後,向已繫屬之法院為之。
聲請定暫時狀態之處分時,聲請人就其爭執之法律關係,為防止發生重大之損害或避免急迫之危險或有其他相類之情形而有必要之事實,應釋明之;其釋明有不足者,法院應駁回聲請。
聲請之原因雖經釋明,法院仍得命聲請人供擔保後為定暫時狀態之處分。
法院為定暫時狀態之處分前,應令兩造有陳述意見之機會。
但聲請人主張有不能於處分前通知相對人陳述之特殊情事,並提出確實之證據,經法院認為適當者,不在此限。
定暫時狀態之處分,自送達聲請人之日起三十日內未起訴者,法院得依聲請或依職權撤銷之。
前項撤銷處分之裁定應公告,於公告時生效。
定暫時狀態之裁定,因自始不當或債權人聲請,或因第五項之情形,經法院撤銷時,聲請人應賠償相對人因處分所受之損害。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.