Regulations Governing Remote Hearings and Transmission of Documents for Intellectual Property Cases by the Court Article 5
A judge may authorize a court clerk to register the usage of a tribunal on the court side in the remote interrogation scheduling system before 3 p.m. on the day before the remote hearing. The registration procedures shall be handled together, and the declarant shall be advised to appear on time for interrogation or to make statements, if the remote side is, as mentioned in Paragraph 1 of Article 3, a court, prosecutors office, government agency, or other suitable premises which are capable of registering in the remote interrogation scheduling system.A case requiring an urgent trial may waive the restriction described in the preceding paragraph, provided the court side shall first coordinate with the remote side, and the declarant shall be advised to appear on time for interrogation or make statements.Registration in the remote interrogation scheduling system as described in Paragraph 1 is on a first-come, first-serve basis. If the registration schedule for the day is full, no further registration for that day will be accepted by the scheduling system.In the event of any changes to the registration in the remote interrogation scheduling system in Paragraph 1, an amendment shall be made to the registration via the scheduling system.
中文原文 法院辦理智慧財產案件遠距訊問作業辦法第5條
法官進行遠距訊問前,得授權書記官,利用遠距訊問排程系統,於訊問前一日下午三時前登記使用訊問端,並通知受訊問端法院、政府機關、其他處所及受訊問人準時至受訊問端應訊。
因案情需緊急訊問者,得不受前項規定之限制。
但應由訊問端法院先行與受訊問端法院、檢察署、政府機關或其他處所協調。
第一項排程之登記,以登記順序前者優先選擇,如同一日登記之排程已屆滿,該日之排程即不受理登記。
因案情需緊急訊問者,得不受前項規定之限制。
但應由訊問端法院先行與受訊問端法院、檢察署、政府機關或其他處所協調。
第一項排程之登記,以登記順序前者優先選擇,如同一日登記之排程已屆滿,該日之排程即不受理登記。