Enforcement Act of the Administrative Litigation Act Article 8
Where a case in which a violation of the Road Traffic Management and Penalty Act is objected to and pending in the district court before the amendment of the Administrative Litigation Act took effect on September 6, 2012, and, after the amended Administrative Litigation Act takes effect, the case shall be adjudicated by the original judge in accordance with the provisions of the Road Traffic Management and Penalty Act before its amendment on November 4, 2011.Where an appeal against the ruling as provided for in the preceding paragraph is made, and where an appeal is made against the final judgment rendered by a district court in accordance with the Road Traffic Management and Penalty Act before the amendment of the Administrative Litigation Act took effect on September 6, 2012, such appeals shall be adjudicated by the High Court in accordance with the provisions of the Road Traffic Management and Penalty Act before its amendment on November 4, 2011.Where a pleading of objection was submitted to the original administrative agency that made the administrative act before the amended Administrative Litigation Act took effect on September 6, 2012, and that administrative agency transfers the case to a district court with jurisdiction within two months of the amended Administrative Litigation Act taking effect, the case shall be considered pending at the relevant court prior to the amended Administrative Litigation Act.
中文原文 行政訴訟法施行法第8條
中華民國一百零一年九月六日行政訴訟法修正施行前,已繫屬於地方法院之違反道路交通管理處罰條例聲明異議事件,於修正行政訴訟法施行後尚未終結者,仍由原法官依一百年十一月四日修正前之道路交通管理處罰條例規定審理。
前項裁定之抗告及中華民國一百零一年九月六日行政訴訟法修正施行前,已由地方法院終結之違反道路交通管理處罰條例聲明異議事件之抗告,由高等法院依一百年十一月四日修正前之道路交通管理處罰條例規定審理。
中華民國一百零一年九月六日行政訴訟法修正施行前,已提出聲明異議書狀於原處分機關者,原處分機關於修正行政訴訟法施行後二個月內送交該管地方法院,視為於修正行政訴訟法施行前已繫屬於各該法院。
前項裁定之抗告及中華民國一百零一年九月六日行政訴訟法修正施行前,已由地方法院終結之違反道路交通管理處罰條例聲明異議事件之抗告,由高等法院依一百年十一月四日修正前之道路交通管理處罰條例規定審理。
中華民國一百零一年九月六日行政訴訟法修正施行前,已提出聲明異議書狀於原處分機關者,原處分機關於修正行政訴訟法施行後二個月內送交該管地方法院,視為於修正行政訴訟法施行前已繫屬於各該法院。