Enforcement Act of the Administrative Litigation Act Article 6
For cases in which the small claims proceeding was applicable became final under the old Administrative Litigation Act before its amendment taking effect on September 6, 2012, if a party initiates a litigation for a rehearing, the litigation shall be handled in accordance with the following provisions:1. Where the litigation for rehearing is initiated against a final judgment rendered by a High Administrative Court, or the litigation for rehearing is initiated against a final judgment rendered by the Supreme Administrative Court on the grounds stipulated in Subparagraphs 9 to 14 of Paragraph 1 of Article 273 of the Administrative Litigation Act, the case shall be adjudicated by a district administrative court according to the amended Administrative Litigation Act; and2. Where the litigation for a rehearing is initiated against a first-instance or second-instance judgment rendered by the High Administrative Court and the Supreme Administrative Court, or the litigation for a rehearing is initiated against a judgment rendered by the Supreme Administrative Court but not on the grounds of Subparagraphs 9 to 14 of Paragraph 1 of Article 273, the case shall be adjudicated by the Supreme Administrative Court in accordance with the Administrative Litigation Act as it was before the amendment took on September 6, 2012. If necessary, the court may transfer the case to the district administrative court with jurisdiction, and the case shall be adjudicated there in accordance with the amended Administrative Litigation Act.In the circumstances provided for in subparagraph 1 of the preceding Paragraph, the High Administrative Court shall, by a ruling, transfer the pending small claims rehearing case to the district administrative court with jurisdiction.The preceding two paragraphs shall apply mutatis mutandis to the applications for rehearing against rulings.
中文原文 行政訴訟法施行法第6條
依中華民國一百零一年九月六日行政訴訟法修正施行前之規定確定之簡易訴訟程序事件,當事人提起再審之訴者,依下列規定辦理:
一、對於高等行政法院之確定判決提起再審之訴或對最高行政法院之判決提起再審之訴而本於行政訴訟法第二百七十三條第一項第九款至第十四款事由聲明不服者:由地方行政法院依修正行政訴訟法審理。
二、對於高等行政法院及最高行政法院所為之第一審、第二審判決提起再審之訴或對最高行政法院判決提起再審之訴而非本於第二百七十三條第一項第九款至第十四款事由聲明不服者:由最高行政法院依中華民國一百零一年九月六日行政訴訟法修正施行前之規定審理。
必要時,發交管轄之地方行政法院依修正行政訴訟法審理。
前項第一款情形,高等行政法院已受理未終結之簡易訴訟再審事件,應裁定移送管轄之地方行政法院。
前二項情形,於對裁定聲請再審事件準用之。
一、對於高等行政法院之確定判決提起再審之訴或對最高行政法院之判決提起再審之訴而本於行政訴訟法第二百七十三條第一項第九款至第十四款事由聲明不服者:由地方行政法院依修正行政訴訟法審理。
二、對於高等行政法院及最高行政法院所為之第一審、第二審判決提起再審之訴或對最高行政法院判決提起再審之訴而非本於第二百七十三條第一項第九款至第十四款事由聲明不服者:由最高行政法院依中華民國一百零一年九月六日行政訴訟法修正施行前之規定審理。
必要時,發交管轄之地方行政法院依修正行政訴訟法審理。
前項第一款情形,高等行政法院已受理未終結之簡易訴訟再審事件,應裁定移送管轄之地方行政法院。
前二項情形,於對裁定聲請再審事件準用之。