Administrative Litigation Act Article 243
A judgment is in contravention of the laws and regulations if the applicable laws are not applied or are erroneously applied.A judgment is obviously in contravention of the laws and regulations in the following situations:1. Where the court is not organized in conformity with the laws;2. Where a judge who should have recused himself or herself under law or a judgment or ruling has participated in the trial or deliberation;3. Where the administrative court lacks the subject matter jurisdiction or acts in violation of another court's exclusive jurisdiction; however, if there are other rules, such other rules prevail;4. Where no agent or representative legally represent the parties in the litigation;5. Where the court violates the requirement that the oral argument be open to the public;6. Where the judgment does not provide reasons or provides contradictory reasons.
中文原文 行政訴訟法第243條
判決不適用法規或適用不當者，為違背法令。
有下列各款情形之一者，其判決當然違背法令：
一、判決法院之組織不合法。
二、依法律或裁判應迴避之法官參與裁判。
三、行政法院於審判權之有無辨別不當或違背專屬管轄之規定。
但其他法律別有規定者，從其規定。
四、當事人於訴訟未經合法代理或代表。
五、違背言詞辯論公開之規定。
六、判決不備理由或理由矛盾。
有下列各款情形之一者，其判決當然違背法令：
一、判決法院之組織不合法。
二、依法律或裁判應迴避之法官參與裁判。
三、行政法院於審判權之有無辨別不當或違背專屬管轄之規定。
但其他法律別有規定者，從其規定。
四、當事人於訴訟未經合法代理或代表。
五、違背言詞辯論公開之規定。
六、判決不備理由或理由矛盾。