Administrative Litigation Act Article 237-4
After receiving the complaint as provided for in the preceding Article, the district administrative court shall serve a duplicate copy of the complaint on the defendant.The defendant shall re-examine the lawfulness and appropriateness of the original decision within twenty days after receiving a duplicate copy of the complaint and take the following actions:1. Where the plaintiff initiates litigation for revocation, if the defendant finds that the original decision is unlawful or inappropriate, the defendant shall revoke the original decision or amend the initial decision on its own but shall not render a decision that is more disadvantageous to the plaintiff;2. Where the plaintiff initiates litigation for a declaratory judgment, if the defendant finds that the original decision is invalid or unlawful, the defendant shall so declare;3. Where litigation demanding the performance of certain obligations is initiated by the plaintiff, if the defendant finds that the plaintiff's claim has merits, the defendant shall immediately perform the obligations; and4. After re-examining the case, if the defendant determines not to take the measures as requested by the plaintiff, the defendant shall submit an answer together with the re-examination records and all other necessary relevant documents to the district administrative court that has jurisdiction.Where the defendant has taken measures per Subparagraphs 1 to 3 of the preceding Paragraph, the defendant shall promptly inform the district administrative court that has jurisdiction. Where the defendant has taken every measure requested by the plaintiff before the first-instance final decision takes effect, it shall be deemed that the plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed the case when the defendant informed the administrative litigation division of the district court with jurisdiction.
中文原文 行政訴訟法第237-4條
地方行政法院收受前條起訴狀後,應將起訴狀繕本送達被告。
被告收受起訴狀繕本後,應於二十日內重新審查原裁決是否合法妥當,並分別為如下之處置:
一、原告提起撤銷之訴,被告認原裁決違法或不當者,應自行撤銷或變更原裁決。
但不得為更不利益之處分。
二、原告提起確認之訴,被告認原裁決無效或違法者,應為確認。
三、原告合併提起給付之訴,被告認原告請求有理由者,應即返還。
四、被告重新審查後,不依原告之請求處置者,應附具答辯狀,並將重新審查之紀錄及其他必要之關係文件,一併提出於管轄之地方行政法院。
被告依前項第一款至第三款規定為處置者,應即陳報管轄之地方行政法院;被告於第一審終局裁判生效前已完全依原告之請求處置者,以其陳報管轄之地方行政法院時,視為原告撤回起訴。
被告收受起訴狀繕本後,應於二十日內重新審查原裁決是否合法妥當,並分別為如下之處置:
一、原告提起撤銷之訴,被告認原裁決違法或不當者,應自行撤銷或變更原裁決。
但不得為更不利益之處分。
二、原告提起確認之訴,被告認原裁決無效或違法者,應為確認。
三、原告合併提起給付之訴,被告認原告請求有理由者,應即返還。
四、被告重新審查後,不依原告之請求處置者,應附具答辯狀,並將重新審查之紀錄及其他必要之關係文件,一併提出於管轄之地方行政法院。
被告依前項第一款至第三款規定為處置者,應即陳報管轄之地方行政法院;被告於第一審終局裁判生效前已完全依原告之請求處置者,以其陳報管轄之地方行政法院時,視為原告撤回起訴。