Administrative Litigation Act Article 113
The plaintiff may, before the judgment has become binding, voluntarily dismiss the case in whole or in part, but the plaintiff cannot dismiss the case if such dismissal would be detrimental to protecting the public interest.Where the defendant has proceeded orally on the merits of the principal case, such dismissal shall be subject to the defendant's consent.A voluntary dismissal shall be made by pleadings. Notwithstanding, it may be made orally in the court session.A voluntary dismissal made orally shall be indicated in the transcript and in the case where the opposing party was not present, such transcript shall be served on the opposing party.The defendant is deemed to have agreed to the voluntary dismissal if the defendant does not object to such dismissal within ten days from the day of the court session in the case where the defendant appeared and did not express whether the defendant agreed or disagreed, or from the day of service of the transcript provided in the preceding Paragraph or the dismissal pleading in case where the defendant failed to appear in the court session or where the dismissal is made by pleadings.
中文原文 行政訴訟法第113條
原告於判決確定前得撤回訴之全部或一部。
但於公益之維護有礙者,不在此限。
前項撤回,被告已為本案之言詞辯論者,應得其同意。
訴之撤回,應以書狀為之。
但於期日得以言詞為之。
以言詞所為之撤回,應記載於筆錄,如他造不在場,應將筆錄送達。
訴之撤回,被告於期日到場,未為同意與否之表示者,自該期日起;其未於期日到場或係以書狀撤回者,自前項筆錄或撤回書狀送達之日起,十日內未提出異議者,視為同意撤回。
但於公益之維護有礙者,不在此限。
前項撤回,被告已為本案之言詞辯論者,應得其同意。
訴之撤回,應以書狀為之。
但於期日得以言詞為之。
以言詞所為之撤回,應記載於筆錄,如他造不在場,應將筆錄送達。
訴之撤回,被告於期日到場,未為同意與否之表示者,自該期日起;其未於期日到場或係以書狀撤回者,自前項筆錄或撤回書狀送達之日起,十日內未提出異議者,視為同意撤回。