Citizen Judges Act (Act on Criminal Trials with the participation of Citizen Judge (Guomin Faguan)) Article 90
The parties and the defense attorney may not petition for investigation on a new piece of evidence unless where there is one of the following circumstances and the said investigation is necessary:1. Where there exist circumstances set forth in Subparagraph 1, 4 or 6 of Paragraph 1 of Article 64;2. Where the failure to investigate the piece of evidence in question in the trial proceedings of the first instance was not due to the negligence on part of the parties; or3. Where the new facts or new pieces of evidence in question were created or formed only after the conclusion of the proceedings of oral arguments in the proceedings of the first instance.The court of second instance may base its decision on evidence that is found admissible and has been legally investigated by the original court in the first instance.
中文原文 國民法官法第90條
當事人、辯護人於第二審法院，不得聲請調查新證據。
但有下列情形之一，而有調查之必要者，不在此限：
一、有第六十四條第一項第一款、第四款或第六款之情形。
二、非因過失，未能於第一審聲請。
三、於第一審辯論終結後始存在或成立之事實、證據。
有證據能力，並經原審合法調查之證據，第二審法院得逕作為判斷之依據。
但有下列情形之一，而有調查之必要者，不在此限：
一、有第六十四條第一項第一款、第四款或第六款之情形。
二、非因過失，未能於第一審聲請。
三、於第一審辯論終結後始存在或成立之事實、證據。
有證據能力，並經原審合法調查之證據，第二審法院得逕作為判斷之依據。