Citizen Judges Act (Act on Criminal Trials with the participation of Citizen Judge (Guomin Faguan)) Article 62

Before the conclusion of the preliminary proceedings the court shall make a ruling on the admissibility of evidence upon which an investigation is conducted upon petition or on its own initiative, unless there is a need to investigate the admissibility of the evidence in the trial proceedings on the trial dates.The court shall dismiss by a ruling, before the conclusion of the preliminary proceedings, the petition for the investigation of evidence filed by a party or a defense attorney when it deems unnecessary.Where there exists one of the following circumstances a petition for the investigation of evidence shall be deemed unnecessary:1. Where the evidence cannot be investigated;2. Where the evidence is not of critical relevance to the facts to be proven;3. Where the evidence is unnecessary because the facts to be proven are clear; or4. Where the evidence has been petitioned before.The court may conduct a necessary investigation before making a ruling pursuant to the Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this article. However, the court may not order a submission of the evidence that a party petitioned for investigation unless it deems it necessary.Where after the making of a ruling pursuant to the Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this article the basic facts on which the court's ruling based on has changed so that a different ruling is called for, the court shall make a new ruling. The same shall apply to a situation where the evidence a party petitioned for investigation is subsequently found no longer necessary.With regard to evidence upon which an investigation is not conducted upon petition or on its own initiative until the trial date, the court shall make a ruling on its admissibility before conducting an investigation on it. The same shall apply to a situation where the evidence a party petitioned for investigation is found unnecessary.A piece of evidence that is ruled by a court to be inadmissible or unnecessary may not be presented or investigated upon on the trial date.No interlocutory appeal may be filed against a ruling made pursuant to Paragraphs 1, 2, 5, or 6 of this article.
中文原文 國民法官法第62條
法院應於準備程序終結前,就聲請或職權調查證據之證據能力有無為裁定。
但就證據能力之有無,有於審判期日調查之必要者,不在此限。
當事人或辯護人聲請調查之證據,法院認為不必要者,應於準備程序終結前以裁定駁回之。
下列情形,應認為不必要:
一、不能調查。
二、與待證事實無重要關係。
三、待證事實已臻明瞭無再調查之必要。
四、同一證據再行聲請。
法院於第一項、第二項裁定前,得為必要之調查。
但非有必要者,不得命提出所聲請調查之證據。
法院依第一項、第二項規定為裁定後,因所憑之基礎事實改變,致應為不同之裁定者,應即重新裁定;就聲請調查之證據,嗣認為不必要者,亦同。
審判期日始聲請或職權調查之證據,法院應於調查該項證據前,就其證據能力有無為裁定;就聲請調查之證據認為不必要者,亦同。
證據經法院裁定無證據能力或不必要者,不得於審判期日主張或調查之。
第一項、第二項、第五項及第六項之裁定,不得抗告。

English translation for reference only; the Chinese text prevails. Not legal advice.