Citizen Judges Act (Act on Criminal Trials with the participation of Citizen Judge (Guomin Faguan)) Article 44
After the filing of the prosecution until the first trial date matters in relation to compulsive measures and perpetuation of evidence shall be reviewed by a judge of the competent court who does not participate in the trial of case concerned, except for in a circumstance where the limit of the number of judges of the competent court makes assigning the above task to a judge who does not participate in the trial of case concerned impossible.Under the circumstance stipulated in the proviso of the preceding paragraph, the judge concerned shall not accept nor order for submission of statements or evidence that are irrelevant to the review of compulsive measures concerned.
中文原文 國民法官法第44條
於起訴後至第一次審判期日前,有關強制處分及證據保全之事項,由未參與本案審理之管轄法院法官處理之。
但因管轄法院法官員額不足,致不能由未參與本案審理之法官處理時,不在此限。
前項但書情形,法官不得接受或命提出與該強制處分審查無關之陳述或證據。
但因管轄法院法官員額不足,致不能由未參與本案審理之法官處理時,不在此限。
前項但書情形,法官不得接受或命提出與該強制處分審查無關之陳述或證據。