Citizen Judges Act (Act on Criminal Trials with the participation of Citizen Judge (Guomin Faguan)) Article 35
The court shall rule to dismiss a citizen judge or an alternate citizen judge ex officio or upon the written petition submitted by the parties of the case, the defense attorney, or the assistant where there exists any of the following circumstances:1. Where the citizen judge or alternate citizen judge lacks the necessary qualifications set forth in Article 12, Paragraph 1, or where there exists a ground of ineligibility set forth in Articles 13 to 15;2. Where the citizen judge or alternate citizen judge fails to make an affirmation in accordance with the provisions of this Act;3. Where the citizen judge or alternate citizen judge makes a false statement to the questions asked during the selection process, which constitutes sufficient grounds to determine that it is inappropriate for him or her to continue performing the duties;4. Where the citizen judge or alternate citizen judge fails to participate in the entirety of the proceedings on the trial dates or final deliberation in accordance with the provisions of this Act, which constitutes sufficient grounds to determine that it is inappropriate for him or her to continue performing the duties ;5. Where the citizen judge or alternate citizen judge fails to follow the orders given by the presiding judge and disrupts the legal proceedings on the trial dates or final deliberation, which constitutes sufficient grounds to determine that it is inappropriate for him or her to continue performing the duties ;6. Where the citizen judge or alternate citizen judge jeopardizes the fairness and credibility of the judiciary or discloses confidential information, which constitutes sufficient grounds to determine that it is inappropriate for him or her to continue performing the duties;7. Where a situation attributable to the citizen judge or alternate citizen judge constitutes sufficient grounds to determine that it is inappropriate for him or her to continue performing the duties; or8. Where the citizen judge or alternate citizen judge cannot perform his or her duties or it is inappropriate for him or her to perform the duties due to a force majeure event.Before making a ruling in accordance with the preceding paragraph, the court shall hear the opinions of the parties of the case, the defense attorney, or the assistant of the accused and offer the citizen judge or alternate citizen judge concerned an opportunity to state his or her opinion, and this proceeding shall be held in private.The parties of the case, the defense attorney, or the assistant of the accused may petition for the ruling made pursuant to Paragraph 1 of this article to be revoked and for the court to make a new ruling in its place.The petition made pursuant to the preceding paragraph shall be ruled by another tribunal of the same court. The litigation proceedings shall be suspended pending the ruling on the said petition.The ruling to be made pursuant to the preceding paragraph shall be made immediately. The tribunal shall revoke the original ruling and make its own ruling if it deems the petition meritorious.No interlocutory appeal may be filed against a ruling made under paragraph 4 of this article.
中文原文 國民法官法第35條
國民法官、備位國民法官有下列情形之一者,法院應依職權或當事人、辯護人、輔佐人之書面聲請,以裁定解任之:
一、不具第十二條第一項所定資格,或有第十三條至第十五條所定情形。
二、未依本法規定宣誓。
三、於選任程序受詢問時為虛偽之陳述,足認其繼續執行職務已不適當。
四、未依本法規定全程參與審判期日之訴訟程序、參與終局評議,足認其繼續執行職務已不適當。
五、不聽從審判長之指揮,致妨害審判期日之訴訟程序或終局評議之順暢進行,足認其繼續執行職務已不適當。
六、為有害司法公正信譽之行為或洩漏應予保密之事項,足認其繼續執行職務已不適當。
七、其他可歸責於國民法官、備位國民法官之事由,足認其繼續執行職務不適當。
八、因不可抗力事由致不能或不宜執行職務。
法院為前項裁定前,應聽取當事人、辯護人及輔佐人之意見,並予該國民法官或備位國民法官陳述意見之機會;其程序,不公開之。
第一項之裁定,當事人、辯護人或輔佐人得聲請撤銷並更為裁定。
前項之聲請,由同法院之其他合議庭裁定,於程序終結前,應停止訴訟程序。
前項裁定,應即時為之;認為聲請有理由者,應撤銷原裁定並自為裁定。
第四項裁定,不得抗告。
一、不具第十二條第一項所定資格,或有第十三條至第十五條所定情形。
二、未依本法規定宣誓。
三、於選任程序受詢問時為虛偽之陳述,足認其繼續執行職務已不適當。
四、未依本法規定全程參與審判期日之訴訟程序、參與終局評議,足認其繼續執行職務已不適當。
五、不聽從審判長之指揮,致妨害審判期日之訴訟程序或終局評議之順暢進行,足認其繼續執行職務已不適當。
六、為有害司法公正信譽之行為或洩漏應予保密之事項,足認其繼續執行職務已不適當。
七、其他可歸責於國民法官、備位國民法官之事由,足認其繼續執行職務不適當。
八、因不可抗力事由致不能或不宜執行職務。
法院為前項裁定前,應聽取當事人、辯護人及輔佐人之意見,並予該國民法官或備位國民法官陳述意見之機會;其程序,不公開之。
第一項之裁定,當事人、辯護人或輔佐人得聲請撤銷並更為裁定。
前項之聲請,由同法院之其他合議庭裁定,於程序終結前,應停止訴訟程序。
前項裁定,應即時為之;認為聲請有理由者,應撤銷原裁定並自為裁定。
第四項裁定,不得抗告。